Literature DB >> 12507007

Failure to find evidence of stimulus generalization within pictorial categories in pigeons.

Jennifer E Sutton1, William A Roberts.   

Abstract

Pigeons' key pecks were reinforced in the presence of pictures from one of two categories, cats or cars. A single picture associated with reinforcement was used in Experiment 1, and 20 pictures from the same category were associated with reinforcement in Experiment 2. Pigeons then were presented with novel test pictures from the training category and from the other, previously unseen, category. During Session 1 of testing, pigeons pecked no more often at pictures from the reinforced category than at pictures from the previously unseen category. When pigeons were trained with pictures associated with reinforcement or its absence from different categories in Experiment 3, differential responding to novel pictures from different categories appeared during Session 1. These findings argue against a process of automatic stimulus generalization within natural categories and in favor of the position that category distinctions are not made until members of at least two categories are compared with one another.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12507007      PMCID: PMC1284903          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2002.78-333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  4 in total

1.  COMPLEX VISUAL CONCEPT IN THE PIGEON.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN; D H LOVELAND
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-10-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Natural concepts in pigeons.

Authors:  R J Hernstein; D H Loveland; C Cable
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1976-10

3.  Acquisition, generalization, and discrimination reversal of a natural concept.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1979-04

4.  Visual classes and natural categories in the pigeon.

Authors:  J Cerella
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 3.332

  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  Naming and categorization in young children: II. Listener behavior training.

Authors:  Pauline J Horne; C Fergus Lowe; Valerie R L Randle
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Error-driven learning in visual categorization and object recognition: a common-elements model.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Matching based on biological categories in Orangutans (Pongo abelii) and a Gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla).

Authors:  Jennifer Vonk
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Mechanisms of object recognition: what we have learned from pigeons.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.492

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.