Literature DB >> 12506332

Appropriateness of digoxin level monitoring.

Mara R Mordasini1, Stephan Krähenbühl, Raymond G Schlienger.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the proportion of inappropriate digoxin level determinations.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 210 randomly selected digoxin plasma level determinations in inpatients. Appropriateness criteria were defined combining existing criteria from the literature. The main outcome measure was the proportion of digoxin levels assessed as inappropriate using a priori defined criteria.
RESULTS: Of the 210 digoxin levels assessed, 125 (59%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 52-66%) were considered inappropriate, 81 (39%; 95% CI: 32-45%) were appropriate, and 4 (2%) determinations could not be evaluated. Of the 125 levels assessed as inappropriate, the majority (79%) was performed as routine monitoring. Extrapolating the results to all digoxin level determinations in inpatients at our institution resulted in estimated yearly costs of CHF 28,025 (approximately B 18,995) for inappropriate digoxin level determinations.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of digoxin plasma levels determinations were assessed as inappropriate. This was mainly due to the lack of an adequate indication and due to incorrect timing of drawing the blood samples. With regard to indication, routine monitoring was the reason for the majority of levels assessed as inappropriate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12506332     DOI: 2002/35/smw-10064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly        ISSN: 0036-7672            Impact factor:   2.193


  7 in total

1.  Appropriateness of serum digoxin levels.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lippi; Gian Luca Salvagno; Martina Montagnana; Giorgio Brocco; Gian Cesare Guidi
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-09-16       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Electronic screening of medical records to detect inpatients at risk of drug-related problems.

Authors:  Isabelle Roten; Stefan Marty; Johnny Beney
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2009-12-10

3.  Educational intervention to improve appropriate digoxin therapeutic drug monitoring: a quasi-experimental study.

Authors:  Seyma Oncu; Anil Baskurt; Bihter Senturk; Ozgur Aslan; Tuncay Kume; Reyhan Ucku; Ayse Gelal
Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2019-10-17

4.  Appropriateness of digoxin measurement in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Seyma Oncu; Ayse Gelal; Ozgur Aslan; Reyhan S Ucku
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 2.313

5.  A National Survey of Attitudes and Practices of Physicians Relating to Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Pharmacokinetic Service: Strategies for Enhancing Patient's Care in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Ziyad Alrabiah; Abdulrahman Alwhaibi; Sary Alsanea; Fars K Alanazi; Hisham S Abou-Auda
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-04-23

Review 6.  The landscape of inappropriate laboratory testing: a 15-year meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ming Zhi; Eric L Ding; Jesse Theisen-Toupal; Julia Whelan; Ramy Arnaout
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Sampling time and indications appropriateness for therapeutically monitored drugs at a teaching university hospital in Oman.

Authors:  Mohammed Al Za'abi; Juhina Al Muqbali; Khalid Al-Waili
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 4.330

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.