Literature DB >> 12506276

Initial nasolacrimal duct probing in children under age 5: cure rate and factors affecting success.

Mohsen Bahmani Kashkouli1, Abolfazl Kassaee, Ziaeddin Tabatabaee.   

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate the success rate of initial probing and the factors affecting the success rate for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO)in children under the age of 5 years.
METHODS: In a prospective uncontrolled interventional case series, 207 eyes from 161 consecutive patients with CNLDO underwent nasolacrimal duct probing under brief general anesthesia. Based on exclusion criteria, 180 eyes from 139 patients were included in the study. Diagnoses were made according to the patients' histories, clinical examinations, and modified dye disappearance tests. The state of the punctum, the canaliculus, the sac, and the nasolacrimal duct were recorded. The main outcome measure was the complete disappearance of tearing and discharge in the affected eye. The patients were followed at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: The age range was 5 to 60 months (mean, 19.1 +/- 11.2 months). The cure rates were 92% in the first year, 84.5% in the second year, 65% in the third year, and 63.5 in the fourth and fifth years of age. The patient's age, nonmemberanous CNLDO, and canalicular stenosis were correlated with the success of initial nasolacrimal duct probing (P <.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results, simplicity of probing, and absence of significant complications, initial nasolacrimal duct probing is advised up to the age of 5 years. Increasing age, nonmembranous CNLDO, and canalicular stenosis increase the failure rate (P <.05).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12506276     DOI: 10.1067/mpa.2002.129041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  15 in total

1.  Office probing for treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in infants.

Authors:  Aaron M Miller; Danielle L Chandler; Michael X Repka; Darren L Hoover; Katherine A Lee; Michele Melia; Paul J Rychwalski; David I Silbert; Roy W Beck; Eric R Crouch; Sean Donahue; Jonathan M Holmes; Graham E Quinn; Nick A Sala; Susan Schloff; David K Wallace; Nicole C Foster; Kevin D Frick; Richard P Golden; Scott R Lambert; D Robbins Tien; David R Weakley
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.220

2.  Clinical outcomes of initial and repeated nasolacrimal duct office-based probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Deok Sun Cha; Hwa Lee; Min Soo Park; Jong Mi Lee; Se Hyun Baek
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-10-05

3.  Probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in older children.

Authors:  Bahram Eshragi; Masoud Aghsaei Fard; Babak Masomian; Mohammadreza Akbari
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec

Review 4.  [Minimally invasive diagnostics and therapy of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction].

Authors:  J Heichel; H-G Struck
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Primary treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction with probing in children younger than 4 years.

Authors:  Michael X Repka; Danielle L Chandler; Roy W Beck; Eric R Crouch; Sean Donahue; Jonathan M Holmes; Katherine Lee; Michele Melia; Graham E Quinn; Nick A Sala; Susan Schloff; David I Silbert; David K Wallace
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  The rate of symptomatic improvement of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in Japanese infants treated with conservative management during the 1st year of age.

Authors:  Hirohiko Kakizaki; Yasuhiro Takahashi; Shinsuke Kinoshita; Kunihiko Shiraki; Masayoshi Iwaki
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06

7.  Efficacy of probing for children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: a retrospective study using fluorescein dye disappearance test and lacrimal sac echography.

Authors:  Piero Steindler; Enrico Mantovani; Carlo Incorvaia; Francesco Parmeggiani
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Outcome of monocanalicular intubation for complex congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: the role of age.

Authors:  Bahram Eshraghi; Hadi Ghadimi; Safoora Karami; Mojgan Nikdel
Journal:  Rom J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar

9.  Success rate of probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction at various ages.

Authors:  Semi Perveen; Aalia Rasool Sufi; Sabia Rashid; Afroz Khan
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2014-01

10.  Nasal endoscopy in the management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Yasser H Al-Faky
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.