Literature DB >> 12506205

Automatic classification of protein structure by using Gauss integrals.

Peter Rogen1, Boris Fain.   

Abstract

We introduce a method of looking at, analyzing, and comparing protein structures. The topology of a protein is captured by 30 numbers inspired by Vassiliev knot invariants. To illustrate the simplicity and power of this topological approach, we construct a measure (scaled Gauss metric, SGM) of similarity of protein shapes. Under this metric, protein chains naturally separate into fold clusters. We use SGM to construct an automatic classification procedure for the CATH2.4 database. The method is very fast because it requires neither alignment of the chains nor any chain-chain comparison. It also has only one adjustable parameter. We assign 95.51% of the chains into the proper C (class), A (architecture), T (topology), and H (homologous superfamily) fold, find all new folds, and detect no false geometric positives. Using the SGM, we display a "map" of the space of folds projected onto two dimensions, show the relative locations of the major structural classes, and "zoom into" the space of proteins to show architecture, topology, and fold clusters. The existence of a simple measure of a protein fold computed from the chain path will have a major impact on automatic fold classification.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12506205      PMCID: PMC140900          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2636460100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  16 in total

1.  Protein fold similarity estimated by a probabilistic approach based on C(alpha)-C(alpha) distance comparison.

Authors:  Oliviero Carugo; Sándor Pongor
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-01-25       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Structural similarity of DNA-binding domains of bacteriophage repressors and the globin core.

Authors:  S Subbiah; D V Laurents; M Levitt
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (CE) of the optimal path.

Authors:  I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1998-09

4.  A surface of minimum area metric for the structural comparison of proteins.

Authors:  A Falicov; F E Cohen
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-05-24       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Extraction of geometrically similar substructures: least-squares and Chebyshev fitting and the difference distance matrix.

Authors:  A M Lesk
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1998-11-15

6.  Comprehensive assessment of automatic structural alignment against a manual standard, the scop classification of proteins.

Authors:  M Gerstein; M Levitt
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices.

Authors:  L Holm; C Sander
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-09-05       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  The FSSP database of structurally aligned protein fold families.

Authors:  L Holm; C Sander
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  On the use of chemically derived distance constraints in the prediction of protein structure with myoglobin as an example.

Authors:  F E Cohen; M J Sternberg
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1980-02-15       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  RMS/coverage graphs: a qualitative method for comparing three-dimensional protein structure predictions.

Authors:  T J Hubbard
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999
View more
  50 in total

1.  Funnel sculpting for in silico assembly of secondary structure elements of proteins.

Authors:  Boris Fain; Michael Levitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Sensitivity and selectivity in protein structure comparison.

Authors:  Michael L Sierk; William R Pearson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 3.  Knot theory in understanding proteins.

Authors:  Rama Mishra; Shantha Bhushan
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 2.259

4.  Comprehensive evaluation of protein structure alignment methods: scoring by geometric measures.

Authors:  Rachel Kolodny; Patrice Koehl; Michael Levitt
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2005-01-16       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  A topological algorithm for identification of structural domains of proteins.

Authors:  Frank Emmert-Streib; Arcady Mushegian
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  A new computational model to study mass inhomogeneity and hydrophobicity inhomogeneity in proteins.

Authors:  Anirban Banerji; Indira Ghosh
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 1.733

7.  Accuracy analysis of multiple structure alignments.

Authors:  Christoph Berbalk; Christine S Schwaiger; Peter Lackner
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  GOSSIP: a method for fast and accurate global alignment of protein structures.

Authors:  I Kifer; R Nussinov; H J Wolfson
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  FragBag, an accurate representation of protein structure, retrieves structural neighbors from the entire PDB quickly and accurately.

Authors:  Inbal Budowski-Tal; Yuval Nov; Rachel Kolodny
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Fractal symmetry of protein interior: what have we learned?

Authors:  Anirban Banerji; Indira Ghosh
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 9.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.