PURPOSE: Women with a hereditary predisposition for breast cancer have an extremely high risk of developing invasive breast carcinoma, and many women consider prophylactic mastectomy to avoid this risk. The use of prophylactic mastectomy is still debated. Identification of frequent premalignant lesions in mastectomy specimens would support the preventive concept of prophylactic mastectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective study of breast specimens from 67 women at extremely high genetic risk of breast cancer, with or without previous breast cancer, who were undergoing prophylactic mastectomy (66% were carriers of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation). Breast specimens were studied by radiographic and macroscopic examination of 5-mm tissue slices, with subsequent histology of suspicious lesions and random samples from each quadrant of the breast and the nipple area. RESULTS: In 57% of the women, one or more different types of high-risk histopathologic lesions were present: 37% atypical lobular hyperplasia, 39% atypical ductal hyperplasia, 25% lobular carcinoma-in-situ, and 15% ductal carcinoma-in-situ. A 4-mm invasive ductal carcinoma was found in one woman with ductal carcinoma-in-situ. None of these lesions was detected at palpation or mammography, which were performed before the mastectomy. The presence of high-risk lesions was independently related to age older than 40 years (odds ratio, 6.6; P =.01) and to bilateral oophorectomy before prophylactic mastectomy (odds ratio, 0.2; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Many women at high risk of hereditary breast cancer develop high-risk histopathologic lesions, especially after the age of 40 years. Surveillance does not detect such high-risk histopathologic lesions.
PURPOSE:Women with a hereditary predisposition for breast cancer have an extremely high risk of developing invasive breast carcinoma, and many women consider prophylactic mastectomy to avoid this risk. The use of prophylactic mastectomy is still debated. Identification of frequent premalignant lesions in mastectomy specimens would support the preventive concept of prophylactic mastectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective study of breast specimens from 67 women at extremely high genetic risk of breast cancer, with or without previous breast cancer, who were undergoing prophylactic mastectomy (66% were carriers of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation). Breast specimens were studied by radiographic and macroscopic examination of 5-mm tissue slices, with subsequent histology of suspicious lesions and random samples from each quadrant of the breast and the nipple area. RESULTS: In 57% of the women, one or more different types of high-risk histopathologic lesions were present: 37% atypical lobular hyperplasia, 39% atypical ductal hyperplasia, 25% lobular carcinoma-in-situ, and 15% ductal carcinoma-in-situ. A 4-mm invasive ductal carcinoma was found in one woman with ductal carcinoma-in-situ. None of these lesions was detected at palpation or mammography, which were performed before the mastectomy. The presence of high-risk lesions was independently related to age older than 40 years (odds ratio, 6.6; P =.01) and to bilateral oophorectomy before prophylactic mastectomy (odds ratio, 0.2; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Many women at high risk of hereditary breast cancer develop high-risk histopathologic lesions, especially after the age of 40 years. Surveillance does not detect such high-risk histopathologic lesions.
Authors: Soley Bayraktar; Nisreen Elsayegh; Angelica M Gutierrez Barrera; Heather Lin; Henry Kuerer; Tunc Tasbas; Kimberly I Muse; Kaylene Ready; Jennifer Litton; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Constance T Albarracin; Banu Arun Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-08-25 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Derek C Radisky; Marta Santisteban; Hal K Berman; Mona L Gauthier; Marlene H Frost; Carol A Reynolds; Robert A Vierkant; V Shane Pankratz; Daniel W Visscher; Thea D Tlsty; Lynn C Hartmann Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2011-09-15
Authors: Mary L Disis; Ekram Gad; Daniel R Herendeen; Vy Phan- Lai; Kyong Hwa Park; Denise L Cecil; Megan M O'Meara; Piper M Treuting; Ronald A Lubet Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2013-10-23
Authors: Judy C Boughey; Tanya L Hoskin; Amy C Degnim; Thomas A Sellers; Joanne L Johnson; Melanie J Kasner; Lynn C Hartmann; Marlene H Frost Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2010-09-19 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Banu Arun; Kristen J Vogel; Adriana Lopez; Mike Hernandez; Deann Atchley; Kristine R Broglio; Christopher I Amos; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Henry Kuerer; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Constance T Albarracin Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2009-01-27
Authors: Robert M W Hofstra; Amanda B Spurdle; Diana Eccles; William D Foulkes; Niels de Wind; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Frans B L Hogervorst Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Teresa A Rose-Hellekant; Andrew J Skildum; Olga Zhdankin; Amy L Greene; Ronald R Regal; Katherine D Kundel; Donald W Kundel Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2009-04-28