Literature DB >> 12505966

The endotracheal tube moves more often in obese patients undergoing laparoscopy compared with open abdominal surgery.

Tiberiu Ezri1, Vadim Hazin, David Warters, Peter Szmuk, Avi A Weinbroum.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We compared the incidence of movements of the endotracheal tube (ETT) within the trachea in morbidly obese patients undergoing either laparoscopic or open gastroplasty. In a double-blinded, prospective, controlled study, 60 patients (body mass index, 35-60 kg/m(2)) were equally allocated to either laparoscopic LapBand gastroplasty (study group; Group 1) or open laparotomy gastroplasty (control; Group 2), both under standardized general anesthesia. Movements of the ETT were assessed with chest auscultation, peak inspiratory pressure, ETCO(2), SpO(2), and the Rapiscope at predetermined time points: after intubation (baseline values), 5 min before peritoneal inflation in Group 1 and 10 min postintubation in Group 2, at maximal abdominal inflation in Group 1 and 20 min into the procedure in Group 2, 5 min before and 5 min after changing the patient's position from neutral to 10 degrees head up and 10 degrees head down in Group 1 and 30 and 40 min into the procedure in Group 2, 2 min after abdominal deflation and table repositioning in Group 1 and at 50 min in Group 2, and just before extubation in both groups. Twenty-one events of ETT tip movement occurred in both groups. The tube moved in 15 (50%) study (laparoscopy) group patients compared with 6 (20%) controls (laparotomy; P < 0.05), 12 of the former having moved downward either after maximal abdominal insufflation or in association with head-down positioning. The tubes of five study group patients (17%) advanced into the right bronchus, compared with none in the controls (P < 0.05). All changes in position were rectified only by the Rapiscope. IMPLICATIONS: Abdominal insufflation and changes in table position lead to more frequent movements of the endotracheal tube in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic versus open gastroplasty. The Rapiscope identifies all these changes, but not the clinically available variables.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12505966     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200301000-00055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Laryngopharyngeal morbidity following general anaesthesia. Anaesthesiological and laryngological aspects].

Authors:  A Reber; L Hauenstein; M Echternach
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Continuous monitoring of endotracheal tube positioning: closer to the sangreal?

Authors:  Ahmed El Kalioubie; Saad Nseir
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Comparison of the cuff pressure of a TaperGuard endotracheal tube and a cylindrical endotracheal tube after lateral rotation of head during middle ear surgery: A single-blind, randomized clinical consort study.

Authors:  Eunkyung Choi; Yongmin Park; Younghoon Jeon
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  The use of VivaSight™ single lumen endotracheal tube in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Authors:  Michal Barak; Ahmad Assalia; Ahmad Mahajna; Bishara Bishara; Alexander Braginski; Yoram Kluger
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  Estimation of optimal nasotracheal tube depth in adult patients.

Authors:  Sung-Mi Ji
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2017-12-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.