Literature DB >> 12505743

Rescuer position for tracheal intubation on the ground.

Janet Tesler1, Joshua Rucker, Danny Sommer, Alex Vesely, Stuart McClusky, Katharina P Koetter, Wolfgang H Maleck, Joseph A Fisher, Georg A Petroianu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emergency oral tracheal intubations in the pre-hospital setting can be more difficult because the rescuer's position with respect to a patient lying on the ground may not provide optimal conditions for intubation. Since optimal visualisation of the larynx often depends on the force generated during laryngoscopy, we measured the pressure required for intubation (P(i)) as well as the maximum pressure (P(max)) that can be generated with the laryngoscopy blade in seven intubator positions.
METHODS: Nineteen hospital personnel with intubation experience participated in this study. A modified #3 Macintosh laryngoscope blade was used to measure the pressure exerted on the tongue of a manikin placed on the ground during intubation. The following positions were studied: standard, sitting, prone, kneeling, left and right lateral decubitus and straddling.
RESULTS: Intubating in the straddling position required the lowest P(i), as a percent of P(max) (68+/-14%). This was significantly less than the prone, right lateral decubitus and sitting positions. (Tukey's W procedure, P<0.05)
CONCLUSION: The straddling position affords the intubator significantly more reserve force than the prone, right lateral decubitus or sitting position. We suggest that the straddling position may be an advantageous position for pre-hospital intubations especially when visualisation of the glottis is difficult.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12505743     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9572(02)00293-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of tracheal intubation in several positions by the Pentax-AWS Airway Scope: a manikin study.

Authors:  Nobuyasu Komasawa; Ryusuke Ueki; Motoi Itani; Hajime Nomura; Shin-ich Nishi; Yoshiroh Kaminoh
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Supreme® and Soft Seal® for airway management in several positions.

Authors:  Nobuyasu Komasawa; Ryusuke Ueki; Akari Fujii; Aoi Samma; Masashi Nakagawa; Shin-ich Nishi; Yoshiroh Kaminoh
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Face-to-face tracheal intubation in adult patients: a comparison of the Airtraq™, Glidescope™ and Fastrach™ devices.

Authors:  Zehra Ipek Arslan; Volkan Alparslan; Pınar Ozdal; Kamil Toker; Mine Solak
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  How supervision and educational supports impact medical students' preparation for future learning of endotracheal intubation skills: a non-inferiority experimental trial.

Authors:  Julian C Manzone; Maria Mylopoulos; Charlotte Ringsted; Ryan Brydges
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  An Evaluation of the Intubrite Laryngoscope in Simulated In-Hospital and Out-of-Hospital Settings by Individuals with No Clinical Experience: A Randomized, Cross-Over, Manikin Study.

Authors:  Paweł Ratajczyk; Michał Fedorczak; Tomasz Gaszyński
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.