Literature DB >> 12505112

Practical diagnostic management of patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis by clinical probability test, compression ultrasonography, and D-dimer test.

Lidwine W Tick1, Evelien Ton, Theo van Voorthuizen, Marcel M C Hovens, Ivonne Leeuwenburgh, Sacha Lobatto, Pieter J Stijnen, Cees van der Heul, Peter M Huisman, Mark H H Kramer, Menno V Huisman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate a new noninvasive diagnostic strategy for ruling out deep vein thrombosis consisting of either a combination of low clinical probability and normal ultrasonography or a combination of moderate-to-high clinical probability, normal ultrasonography, and a normal D-dimer test. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We studied 811 patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis using a diagnostic management strategy that combined clinical probability, ultrasonography, and measurement of D-dimers. The primary endpoint was venous thromboembolism occurring during a 3-month follow-up.
RESULTS: Of the 280 patients (35%) with a low clinical probability, 30 (11%) had an abnormal initial ultrasonography and were treated. Of the other 250 untreated patients with low clinical probability and a normal ultrasonography, 5 (2%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1% to 5%) developed a nonfatal venous thromboembolism during follow-up. Of the 531 patients (65%) with a moderate-to-high clinical probability, 300 (56%) had an abnormal ultrasonography. Of the remaining 231 patients with a normal ultrasonography, 148 had a normal D-dimer test; none of these patients developed deep vein thrombosis during follow-up (0%; 95% CI: 0% to 3%). Of the 83 patients with an abnormal D-dimer test, 77 underwent repeat ultrasonography about 1 week later; none of the 64 patients with a second normal ultrasound developed symptomatic deep vein thrombosis during follow-up (0%; 95% CI: 0% to 6%).
CONCLUSIONS: This management strategy, which combines clinical probability, ultrasonography, and D-dimer measurements, is practical and safe in ruling out deep vein thrombosis in patients with clinically suspected thrombosis and reduces the need for repeat ultrasonography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12505112     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01347-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  10 in total

1.  Diagnosis of DVT: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Shannon M Bates; Roman Jaeschke; Scott M Stevens; Steven Goodacre; Philip S Wells; Matthew D Stevenson; Clive Kearon; Holger J Schunemann; Mark Crowther; Stephen G Pauker; Regina Makdissi; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 2.  Clinical applications of bedside ultrasonography in internal and emergency medicine.

Authors:  Vincenzo Arienti; Valeria Camaggi
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  Current diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in primary care: a clinical practice guideline from the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American College of Physicians.

Authors:  Amir Qaseem; Vincenza Snow; Patricia Barry; E Rodney Hornbake; Jonathan E Rodnick; Timothy Tobolic; Belinda Ireland; Jodi Segal; Eric Bass; Kevin B Weiss; Lee Green; Douglas K Owens
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 4.  Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis, and prevention of deep vein thrombosis recurrence and the post-thrombotic syndrome in the primary care medicine setting anno 2014.

Authors:  Jan Jacques Michiels; Janneke Maria Michiels; Wim Moossdorff; Mildred Lao; Hanny Maasland; Gualtiero Palareti
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-02-04

Review 5.  Review of the evidence on diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Jodi B Segal; John Eng; Leonardo J Tamariz; Eric B Bass
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 6.  Combined use of rapid D-dimer testing and estimation of clinical probability in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis: systematic review.

Authors:  Tonya L Fancher; Richard H White; Richard L Kravitz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-09-21

7.  Cost-Effective Machine Learning Based Clinical Pre-Test Probability Strategy for DVT Diagnosis in Neurological Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Li Luo; Ran Kou; Yuquan Feng; Jie Xiang; Wei Zhu
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.389

8.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Steve Goodacre; Fiona Sampson; Steve Thomas; Edwin van Beek; Alex Sutton
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 9.  Emergency Department Management of Suspected Calf-Vein Deep Venous Thrombosis: A Diagnostic Algorithm.

Authors:  Levi Kitchen; Matthew Lawrence; Matthew Speicher; Kenneth Frumkin
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-06-28

10.  Diagnostic accuracy of three ultrasonography strategies for deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Noémie Kraaijpoel; Marc Carrier; Grégoire Le Gal; Matthew D F McInnes; Jean-Paul Salameh; Trevor A McGrath; Nick van Es; David Moher; Harry R Büller; Patrick M Bossuyt; Mariska M G Leeflang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.