Literature DB >> 12504880

An example of neural plasticity evoked by putative behavioral demand and early use of vibrissal hairs after facial nerve transection.

Toma L Tomov1, Orlando Guntinas-Lichius, Maria Grosheva, Michael Streppel, Ulrich Schraermeyer, Wolfram F Neiss, Doychin N Angelov.   

Abstract

Abnormally associated movements inevitably occur after surgical repair of the facial nerve. The reason for this postparalytic syndrome is poor navigation of regrowing axons. Despite the valuable functional advantage provided by the easily detected movement of vibrissae in rats, the major investigative tools for establishing the degree of misdirected reinnervation are still electrophysiologic recordings and retrograde tracing. In the present study we complemented data from pre- and postoperative retrograde labeling (FluoroGold, Fast Blue, DiI) of facial motoneurons with an evaluation of whisker movements. Using a video-based motion analysis system, we compared the recovery of vibrissae motor performance in visually normal and blind rats of the Sprague-Dawley strain. The analysis of whisker movement after facial nerve surgery revealed a striking discrepancy between morphologic and functional estimates. Whereas retrograde labeling displayed poor accuracy of target reinnervation and supernumerary axonal branching in both groups, the video-based motion analysis showed a perfect recovery of vibrissae movements in the blind rats. Attributing the complete recovery of whisker movement in the blind rats to an extraordinary plasticity of the facial motoneurons induced by putative behavioral demand and forced overuse, we conclude that the video-based analysis of whisker movement is a valuable tool for studying the progress in functional recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12504880     DOI: 10.1006/exnr.2002.8040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Neurol        ISSN: 0014-4886            Impact factor:   5.330


  19 in total

1.  [Regeneration of the facial nerve in comparison to other peripheral nerves : from bench to bedside].

Authors:  A Irintchev; D N Angelov; O Guntinas-Lichius
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Manual stimulation of forearm muscles does not improve recovery of motor function after injury to a mixed peripheral nerve.

Authors:  N Sinis; O Guntinas-Lichius; A Irintchev; E Skouras; S Kuerten; S P Pavlov; H E Schaller; S A Dunlop; D N Angelov
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  [Experimental studies for the improvement of facial nerve regeneration].

Authors:  O Guntinas-Lichius; D N Angelov
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Daily facial stimulation to improve recovery after facial nerve repair in rats.

Authors:  Robin W Lindsay; James T Heaton; Colin Edwards; Christopher Smitson; Kalpesh Vakharia; Tessa A Hadlock
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2010 May-Jun

5.  Nerve crush but not displacement-induced stretch of the intra-arachnoidal facial nerve promotes facial palsy after cerebellopontine angle surgery.

Authors:  Habib Bendella; Derald E Brackmann; Roland Goldbrunner; Doychin N Angelov
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Non-invasive stimulation of the vibrissal pad improves recovery of whisking function after simultaneous lesion of the facial and infraorbital nerves in rats.

Authors:  H Bendella; S P Pavlov; M Grosheva; A Irintchev; S K Angelova; D Merkel; N Sinis; K Kaidoglou; E Skouras; S A Dunlop; Doychin N Angelov
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Facial nerve axotomy in mice: a model to study motoneuron response to injury.

Authors:  Deborah N Olmstead; Nichole A Mesnard-Hoaglin; Richard J Batka; Melissa M Haulcomb; Whitney M Miller; Kathryn J Jones
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  Quantitative analysis of muscle histologic method in rodent facial nerve injury.

Authors:  Tessa A Hadlock; Sang W Kim; Julie S Weinberg; Christopher J Knox; Marc H Hohman; James T Heaton
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.611

9.  A system for delivering mechanical stimulation and robot-assisted therapy to the rat whisker pad during facial nerve regeneration.

Authors:  James T Heaton; Christopher J Knox; Juan S Malo; James B Kobler; Tessa A Hadlock
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.802

10.  Schwann cells overexpressing FGF-2 alone or combined with manual stimulation do not promote functional recovery after facial nerve injury.

Authors:  Kirsten Haastert; Maria Grosheva; Srebrina K Angelova; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius; Emmanouil Skouras; Joern Michael; Claudia Grothe; Sarah A Dunlop; Doychin N Angelov
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2009-10-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.