Literature DB >> 12504330

Evaluation of an improved general unknown screening procedure using liquid chromatography-electrospray-mass spectrometry by comparison with gas chromatography and high-performance liquid-chromatography--diode array detection.

Franck Saint-Marcoux1, Gérard Lachâtre, Pierre Marquet.   

Abstract

This paper presents an improved, comprehensive liquid chromatography-electrospray-mass spectrometry (LC-ES-MS) general unknown screening (GUS) procedure for drugs and toxic compounds and its comparison with conventional techniques in routine laboratory conditions. Chromatographic separation involved an X-TERRA MS C18, 3.5 microm (100 mm x 1 mm i.d.) column together with a 25-min long gradient of acetonitrile in pH 3, 2 mM ammonium formate delivered at a 50 microl/min flow rate. Two different in-source collision-induced dissociation voltages were alternated, both in the positive and in the negative ion modes. Reconstructed spectra were then obtained in both polarities by adding up spectra obtained with low and high energy, resulting in spectra presenting a sufficient number of specific fragment ions for unambiguous and fast identification of compounds. Two large mass spectral libraries of drugs and toxic compounds were built and an efficient automated signal processing, library searching and report editing algorithm developed. Using a common, efficient solid-phase extraction procedure, this LC-ES-MS technique was compared to GC-MS and HPLC-DAD GUS procedures for the identification of a priori unknown compounds in 51 serum samples consecutively sent to the laboratory for GUS. The present LC-MS method identified 75% of the compounds contained in these samples (versus 66% for GC-MS and 71% for HPLC-DAD), including 8% that the other two techniques failed to identify (versus 8% for GC-MS and 9.5% for HPLC-DAD). Therefore, it is complementary to GC-MS and/or HPLC-DAD and helps enlarge the range of drugs detected in clinical toxicology. It could be useful as well in forensic toxicology to confirm a positive result, as 38% of all the compounds were detected by the three techniques and 36% by two of them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12504330     DOI: 10.1016/S1044-0305(02)00801-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1044-0305            Impact factor:   3.109


  15 in total

Review 1.  Is LC-MS suitable for a comprehensive screening of drugs and poisons in clinical toxicology?

Authors:  Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.681

2.  Identification of lorazepam and sildenafil as examples for the application of LC/ionspray-MS and MS-MS with mass spectra library searching in forensic toxicology.

Authors:  W Weinmann; N Lehmann; C Müller; A Wiedemann; M Svoboda
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2000-09-11       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  A general unknown screening procedure for drugs and toxic compounds in serum using liquid chromatography-electrospray-single quadrupole mass spectrometry.

Authors:  N Venisse; P Marquet; E Duchoslav; J L Dupuy; G Lachâtre
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.367

4.  LC/MS with a particle beam interface in forensic toxicology.

Authors:  E Spratt; G M Vallaro
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.935

5.  Guidelines for the interpretation of analytical toxicology results and unit of measurement conversion factors.

Authors:  R J Flanagan
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.057

6.  Analytical development for low molecular weight xenobiotic compounds.

Authors:  H H Maurer; J W Arlt; T Kraemer; C J Schmitt; A A Weber
Journal:  Arch Toxicol Suppl       Date:  1997

7.  Tune compounds for electrospray ionisation/in-source collision-induced dissociation with mass spectral library searching.

Authors:  W Weinmann; M Stoertzel; S Vogt; J Wendt
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2001-08-10       Impact factor: 4.759

8.  Identification power of a standardized HPLC-DAD system for systematic toxicological analysis.

Authors:  R D Maier; M Bogusz
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.367

9.  Screening for drugs in serum by electrospray ionization/collision-induced dissociation and library searching.

Authors:  W Weinmann; A Wiedemann; B Eppinger; M Renz; M Svoboda
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.109

10.  Identification of selected psychopharmaceuticals and their metabolites in hair by LC/ESI-CID/MS and LC/MS/MS.

Authors:  C Müller; S Vogt; R Goerke; A Kordon; W Weinmann
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2000-09-11       Impact factor: 2.395

View more
  3 in total

1.  Performance evaluation of three liquid chromatography mass spectrometry methods for broad spectrum drug screening.

Authors:  Kara L Lynch; Autumn R Breaud; Hilde Vandenberghe; Alan H B Wu; William Clarke
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.786

2.  Characterization and identification of eight designer benzodiazepine metabolites by incubation with human liver microsomes and analysis by a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer.

Authors:  Souleiman El Balkhi; Maxime Chaslot; Nicolas Picard; Sylvain Dulaurent; Martine Delage; Olivier Mathieu; Franck Saint-Marcoux
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 3.  Follicular Fluid: A Powerful Tool for the Understanding and Diagnosis of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Authors:  Ana Teresa Brinca; Ana Cristina Ramalhinho; Ângela Sousa; António Hélio Oliani; Luiza Breitenfeld; Luís A Passarinha; Eugenia Gallardo
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-05-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.