Literature DB >> 12501910

Oral fluid testing for drugs of abuse: positive prevalence rates by Intercept immunoassay screening and GC-MS-MS confirmation and suggested cutoff concentrations.

Edward J Cone1, Lance Presley, Michael Lehrer, William Seiter, Melissa Smith, Keith W Kardos, Dean Fritch, Sal Salamone, R Sam Niedbala.   

Abstract

Draft guidelines for the use of oral fluid for workplace drug testing are under development by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) in cooperation with industry and researchers. Comparison studies of the effectiveness of oral fluid testing versus urine testing are needed to establish scientifically reliable cutoff concentrations for oral fluid testing. We present the results of the first large scale database on oral fluid testing in private industry. A total of 77,218 oral fluid specimens were tested over the period of January through October 2001 at LabOne. Specimens were screened by Intercept immunoassay at manufacturer's recommended cutoff concentrations for the five SAMHSA drug categories (marijuana, cocaine, opiates, phencyclidine, and amphetamines). Presumptive positive specimens were confirmed by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. A total of 3908 positive tests were reported over the 10-month period, representing a positive rate of 5.06%. Of the five drug categories, marijuana and cocaine accounted for 85.75% of the positives. The pattern and frequency of drug positives showed remarkable similarity to urine drug prevalence rates reported for the general workforce according to the Quest Diagnostics' Drug Testing Index over the same general period, suggesting that oral fluid testing produces equivalent results to urine testing. The data on oral fluid testing also revealed a surprisingly high 66.7% prevalence of 6-acetylmorphine confirmations for morphine positives suggesting that oral fluid testing may be superior in some cases to urine testing. Comparison of oral fluid drug concentrations to SAMHSA-recommended cutoff concentrations in Draft Guidelines indicated that adoption of the screening and confirmation cutoff concentrations of Draft Guidelines #3 would produce the most consistent reporting results for all drug classes except amphetamines. Consequently, it is suggested that the final Guidelines adopt the screening and cutoff concentrations listed in Draft Guidelines #3 with the exception of lowering the amphetamines cutoff concentrations (screening/confirmation) to 50/50 ng/mL for amphetamine and methamphetamine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12501910     DOI: 10.1093/jat/26.8.541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anal Toxicol        ISSN: 0146-4760            Impact factor:   3.367


  28 in total

1.  Comparison of oral fluid collectors for use in a rapid point-of-care diagnostic device.

Authors:  Carol Holm-Hansen; Gary Tong; Cheryl Davis; William R Abrams; Daniel Malamud
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2004-09

2.  "Ready, willing, and (not) able" to change: young adults' response to residential treatment.

Authors:  J F Kelly; K A Urbanoski; B B Hoeppner; V Slaymaker
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Use of a single alcohol screening question to identify other drug use.

Authors:  Peter C Smith; Debbie M Cheng; Donald Allensworth-Davies; Michael R Winter; Richard Saitz
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Is residential treatment effective for opioid use disorders? A longitudinal comparison of treatment outcomes among opioid dependent, opioid misusing, and non-opioid using emerging adults with substance use disorder.

Authors:  Zev Schuman-Olivier; M Claire Greene; Brandon G Bergman; John F Kelly
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  The Sponsor Alliance Inventory: Assessing the Therapeutic Bond Between 12-Step Attendees and Their Sponsors.

Authors:  John F Kelly; M Claire Greene; Brandon Bergman; Bettina B Hoeppner; Valerie Slaymaker
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 2.826

6.  A single-question screening test for drug use in primary care.

Authors:  Peter C Smith; Susan M Schmidt; Donald Allensworth-Davies; Richard Saitz
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-07-12

7.  Depression CBT treatment gains among HIV-infected persons with a history of injection drug use varies as a function of baseline substance use.

Authors:  Allison K Labbe; Conall M O'Cleirigh; Michael Stein; Steven A Safren
Journal:  Psychol Health Med       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  Thermographic detection and quantification of THC in oral fluid at unprecedented low concentrations.

Authors:  Damber Thapa; Nakisa Samadi; Nisarg Patel; Nima Tabatabaei
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  Chronic care management for dependence on alcohol and other drugs: the AHEAD randomized trial.

Authors:  Richard Saitz; Debbie M Cheng; Michael Winter; Theresa W Kim; Seville M Meli; Don Allensworth-Davies; Christine A Lloyd-Travaglini; Jeffrey H Samet
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Optimum methadone compliance testing: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.