Literature DB >> 12499966

Adult distal humeral metaphyseal fractures: epidemiology and results of treatment.

C Michael Robinson1, Richard M F Hill, Neal Jacobs, Graham Dall, Charles M Court-Brown.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the epidemiology and results of treatment of fractures of the distal humeral metaphysis.
DESIGN: Observational cohort study.
SETTING: An orthopaedic trauma unit, which provides all the fracture care for a well-defined catchment population. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: A consecutive series of 320 patients with distal humeral fractures admitted to the unit between January 1988 and June 1997. INTERVENTION: We adopted a protocol of open reduction and fixation of all displaced fractures (greater than 5 mm of displacement in any plane) in patients who were medically fit for anesthesia. Postoperative immobilization was a cylinder cast for 6 weeks. Patients with undisplaced fractures or who were medically unfit were also treated nonoperatively in cylinder casts for 6 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Epidemiological examination of patient subgroups and the incidence of complications of treatment.
RESULTS: The overall incidence of distal humeral fractures in adults during this time was 5.7 cases per 100,000 in the population per year with an almost equal male to female ratio. There was a bimodal age distribution, simple falls were the most common overall cause of fracture, and the majority of the fractures were extra-articular (AO/OTA type A) or complete articular fractures (AO/OTA type C). The risk of complications during treatment was generally low in most patients, and the majority healed their fractures uneventfully. Overall, 90.6% of fractures united within 12 weeks and just under half of the remaining 9.4% patients with union complications healed without requiring further operative intervention by 24 weeks. The risk of union complications was higher following high-energy injuries, open fractures, and nonoperative treatment. Although the AO/OTA classification was not predictive of union complications, the "low" transcondylar (type A2.3 and A3) and simple intercondylar fracture (type C1.3) configuration had a greater risk of union complications than the "high" subtype. The rate of infection, myositis ossificans, and other implant-related complications were higher following operative treatment of type C fractures than type A and B fractures.
CONCLUSIONS: The epidemiology of a consecutive unselected series of adult distal humeral fractures is defined in this study. The majority of these fractures are best treated surgically by rigid open reduction and internal fixation, except for "low" Type A and C fractures, which have a higher risk of union complications. The role of total elbow arthroplasty to treat these more complex injuries requires further evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12499966     DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200301000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  61 in total

1.  Total elbow joint replacement for the treatment of distal humerus fracture of type c in eight elderly patients.

Authors:  Wei Tian; Chao He; Jian Jia
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-06-15

Review 2.  [Fractures of the elbow joint].

Authors:  T E Nowak; S O Dietz; K J Burkhart; L P Müller; P M Rommens
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Mid-term results of complex distal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Marco Frattini; Giovanni Soncini; Maurizio Corradi; Bruno Panno; Silvio Tocco; Francesco Pogliacomi
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2011-04-12

4.  Outcome of primary internal fixation of (type C) distal humerus fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  Ahmad M Wafai; Gordhanbhai G Tank; Brian J Holdsworth
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2005-12-23

Review 5.  [Fractures of the distal humerus in the elderly. Pros and cons of endoprosthetic replacement].

Authors:  S-O Dietz; T E Nowak; K J Burkhart; L P Müller; P M Rommens
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 6.  Elbow hemiarthroplasty for the management of distal humeral fractures: current technique, indications and results.

Authors:  Joideep Phadnis; Adam C Watts; Gregory I Bain
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-04-21

7.  [Distal fracture of the humerus].

Authors:  J M Rueger; A Rücker; D Briem
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Midterm clinical and radiological outcomes of the surgical treatment of complex AO type C distal humeral fractures with two different double plate fixation techniques.

Authors:  K Ditsios; S I Stavridis; P Savvidis; H Dinopoulos; G Petsatodis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 0.471

9.  Treatment of distal humeral fractures using conventional implants. Biomechanical evaluation of a new implant configuration.

Authors:  Markus Windolf; Edgardo Ramos Maza; Boyko Gueorguiev; Volker Braunstein; Karsten Schwieger
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  [Primary total elbow replacement for complex intra-articular distal humerus fractures].

Authors:  E Kraus; R Harstall; N Borisch; D Weber
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.