BACKGROUND: In earlier studies with well-nourished subjects that used a 24-h indicator amino acid oxidation or balance approach, we concluded that the 1985 FAO/WHO/UNU requirement for lysine (12 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1)) was inadequate for healthy South Asian subjects and proposed a tentative requirement of 30 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1). OBJECTIVE: We assessed whether chronic undernutrition, with low habitual dietary protein and lysine intakes, leads to changed lysine requirements. DESIGN:Twenty-seven otherwise clinically healthy, chronically undernourished Indian men were studied during 2 randomly assigned 7-d diet periods supplying 12 and 30, 18 and 36, or 24 and 42 mg lysine x kg(-1) x d(-1), based on an L-amino acid diet. The subjects' leucine intake was 40 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1). At 1800 on day 6, a 24-h intravenous [(13)C]leucine tracer-infusion protocol was conducted to assess leucine oxidation and daily leucine balance at each test lysine intake. RESULTS: A breakpoint was not identified in the lysine intake-leucine oxidation or balance response over the range of intakes studied. Mixed-models linear regression analysis indicated a mean requirement of 44 mg lysine x kg(-1) x d(-1) (95% CI: 36, 63) for the lysine intake-leucine balance relation. CONCLUSIONS: The mean lysine requirement in chronically undernourished men is estimated to be higher than the value of 30 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1) proposed for well-nourished individuals. This may be related to body-composition differences. It also suggests that these subjects have not elicited a metabolic adaptation in response to their habitually low lysine intakes by substantially improving their efficiency of dietary lysine utilization.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: In earlier studies with well-nourished subjects that used a 24-h indicator amino acid oxidation or balance approach, we concluded that the 1985 FAO/WHO/UNU requirement for lysine (12 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1)) was inadequate for healthy South Asian subjects and proposed a tentative requirement of 30 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1). OBJECTIVE: We assessed whether chronic undernutrition, with low habitual dietary protein and lysine intakes, leads to changed lysine requirements. DESIGN: Twenty-seven otherwise clinically healthy, chronically undernourished Indian men were studied during 2 randomly assigned 7-d diet periods supplying 12 and 30, 18 and 36, or 24 and 42 mg lysine x kg(-1) x d(-1), based on an L-amino acid diet. The subjects' leucine intake was 40 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1). At 1800 on day 6, a 24-h intravenous [(13)C]leucine tracer-infusion protocol was conducted to assess leucine oxidation and daily leucine balance at each test lysine intake. RESULTS: A breakpoint was not identified in the lysine intake-leucine oxidation or balance response over the range of intakes studied. Mixed-models linear regression analysis indicated a mean requirement of 44 mg lysine x kg(-1) x d(-1) (95% CI: 36, 63) for the lysine intake-leucine balance relation. CONCLUSIONS: The mean lysine requirement in chronically undernourished men is estimated to be higher than the value of 30 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1) proposed for well-nourished individuals. This may be related to body-composition differences. It also suggests that these subjects have not elicited a metabolic adaptation in response to their habitually low lysine intakes by substantially improving their efficiency of dietary lysine utilization.
Authors: Youngja Park; Tiejun Zhao; Nana Gletsu Miller; Seoung Bum Kim; Carolyn Jonas Accardi; Thomas R Ziegler; Xiaoping Hu; Dean P Jones Journal: Nutrition Date: 2011-09-14 Impact factor: 4.008
Authors: John F Tharakan; Yong M Yu; David Zurakowski; Rachel M Roth; Vernon R Young; Leticia Castillo Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2008-06-30 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: Miro Smriga; Shibani Ghosh; Youssef Mouneimne; Peter L Pellett; Nevin S Scrimshaw Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-05-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Alex J Thompson; Claire D Bourke; Ruairi C Robertson; Nirupama Shivakumar; Christine A Edwards; Tom Preston; Elaine Holmes; Paul Kelly; Gary Frost; Douglas J Morrison Journal: Gut Date: 2021-06-08 Impact factor: 23.059