Literature DB >> 12499292

Evolutionary algorithms for finding optimal gene sets in microarray prediction.

J M Deutsch1.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Microarray data has been shown recently to be efficacious in distinguishing closely related cell types that often appear in different forms of cancer, but is not yet practical clinically. However, the data might be used to construct a minimal set of marker genes that could then be used clinically by making antibody assays to diagnose a specific type of cancer. Here a replication algorithm is used for this purpose. It evolves an ensemble of predictors, all using different combinations of genes to generate a set of optimal predictors.
RESULTS: We apply this method to the leukemia data of the Whitehead/MIT group that attempts to differentially diagnose two kinds of leukemia, and also to data of Khan et al. to distinguish four different kinds of childhood cancers. In the latter case we were able to reduce the number of genes needed from 96 to less than 15, while at the same time being able to classify all of their test data perfectly. We also apply this method to two other cases, Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma data (Shipp et al., 2002), and data of Ramaswamy et al. on multiclass diagnosis of 14 common tumor types. AVAILABILITY: http://stravinsky.ucsc.edu/josh/gesses/.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12499292     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/19.1.45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  18 in total

1.  A hybrid BPSO-CGA approach for gene selection and classification of microarray data.

Authors:  Li-Yeh Chuang; Cheng-Huei Yang; Jung-Chike Li; Cheng-Hong Yang
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Analysis of gene expression in pathophysiological states: balancing false discovery and false negative rates.

Authors:  Andrew W Norris; C Ronald Kahn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Development and Validation of Biomarker Classifiers for Treatment Selection.

Authors:  Richard Simon
Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 1.111

4.  Analysis of DNA microarray expression data.

Authors:  Richard Simon
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Haematol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Fusing Gene Interaction to Improve Disease Discrimination on Classification Analysis.

Authors:  Ji-Gang Zhang; Jian Li; Wenlong Tang; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  Adv Genet Eng       Date:  2012-02-09

6.  Gene selection approach based on improved swarm intelligent optimisation algorithm for tumour classification.

Authors:  Cong Jin; Shu-Wei Jin
Journal:  IET Syst Biol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.615

7.  Optimization based tumor classification from microarray gene expression data.

Authors:  Onur Dagliyan; Fadime Uney-Yuksektepe; I Halil Kavakli; Metin Turkay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A comparison of machine learning techniques for survival prediction in breast cancer.

Authors:  Leonardo Vanneschi; Antonella Farinaccio; Giancarlo Mauri; Mauro Antoniotti; Paolo Provero; Mario Giacobini
Journal:  BioData Min       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 2.522

9.  Merging microarray data, robust feature selection, and predicting prognosis in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Kim Anh Do; Sijin Wen; Spyros Tsavachidis; Timothy J McDonnell; Christopher J Logothetis; Kevin R Coombes
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2007-02-14

10.  Combining multiple hypothesis testing and affinity propagation clustering leads to accurate, robust and sample size independent classification on gene expression data.

Authors:  Argiris Sakellariou; Despina Sanoudou; George Spyrou
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.