Literature DB >> 12498893

In vitro biological response to core and flowable dental restorative materials.

John C Wataha1, Petra E Lockwood, Serge Bouillaguet, Mamoru Noda.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In vitro cytotoxicities of commercially available core and flowable dental restorative materials were assessed and compared to traditional resin composites. Our hypothesis was that the increased resin diluents added to achieve higher flow in flowables would increase cytotoxicities, whereas the higher filler content of core materials would decrease cytotoxicities relative to traditional resin composites.
METHODS: Specimens were made under aseptic conditions, then extracted into an artificial saliva solution for 0-4 weeks, to assess the effect of aging on cytotoxicity. After extraction, specimens were tested for cytotoxicity in vitro using Balb/c fibroblasts in direct contact format. Cells were exposed to the materials for 48h, after which the mitochondrial activity of the cells was measured (MTT method). Cellular activity was normalized to Teflon negative controls.
RESULTS: Core materials were uniformly and severely (<50% of Teflon cellular activity) cytotoxic initially, but several materials (Corepaste, Definite core) improved somewhat with aging in artificial saliva. Flowable materials were uniformly and severely cytotoxic with no trend toward improvement with aging. The Definite-flow was the least cytotoxic of the flowable materials, but it too was severely cytotoxic. SIGNIFICANCE: Commercially available core and flowable restorative materials showed severe in vitro cytotoxicities that are worse than some traditional composites and most dental casting alloys and amalgams used today. Of particular note was the persistent cytotoxicity of these materials after 4 weeks of extraction with artificial saliva. These cytotoxicities indicate a continuing release of mass from these materials at levels that have biological relevance in vitro. In vivo relevance of these cytotoxicities is less clear, but these results indicate a higher biological risk for these materials compared to traditional materials that exhibit less initial toxicity and improve with aging time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12498893     DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(02)00012-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  9 in total

1.  In vitro studies on the cytotoxic potential of surface sealants.

Authors:  S Zingler; B Matthei; A Kohl; D Saure; B Ludwig; K Diercke; C J Lux; R Erber
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Cytotoxicity evaluation of dental resin composites and their flowable derivatives.

Authors:  A S Al-Hiyasat; H Darmani; M M Milhem
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2005-01-06       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Oxidative stress and cytotoxicity generated by dental composites in human pulp cells.

Authors:  Stephanie Krifka; Claudia Seidenader; Karl-Anton Hiller; Gottfried Schmalz; Helmut Schweikl
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Dental composite fillings and bisphenol A among children: a survey in South Korea.

Authors:  Sun-Young Chung; Hojang Kwon; Youn-Hee Choi; Wilfried Karmaus; Anwar T Merchant; Keun-Bae Song; Joon Sakong; Mina Ha; Yun-Chul Hong; Dongmug Kang
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.607

5.  Low pressure radio-frequency oxygen plasma induced oxidation of titanium--surface characteristics and biological effects.

Authors:  Wan-Yu Tseng; Sheng-Hao Hsu; Chieh-Hsiun Huang; Yu-Chieh Tu; Shao-Chin Tseng; Hsuen-Li Chen; Min-Huey Chen; Wei-Fang Su; Li-Deh Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Confocal time lapse imaging as an efficient method for the cytocompatibility evaluation of dental composites.

Authors:  Ghania Nina Attik; Kerstin Gritsch; Pierre Colon; Brigitte Grosgogeat
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Cytotoxicity of Light-Cured Dental Materials according to Different Sample Preparation Methods.

Authors:  Myung-Jin Lee; Mi-Joo Kim; Jae-Sung Kwon; Sang-Bae Lee; Kwang-Mahn Kim
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Cytotoxicity evaluation of three resin-based sealers on an L929 cell line.

Authors:  Hengameh Ashraf; Nima Moradimajd; Mohammad Ali Mozayeni; Omid Dianat; Faranak Mahjour; Zahra Yadegari
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2012-09

Review 9.  Ceramic Materials and Technologies Applied to Digital Works in Implant-Supported Restorative Dentistry.

Authors:  Se-Wook Pyo; Dae-Joon Kim; Jung-Suk Han; In-Sung Luke Yeo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.623

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.