Literature DB >> 12498538

Bone regeneration graft materials.

Daid L Hoexter1.   

Abstract

This article focuses on the materials used for the regeneration, rather than repair, of the osseous support needed to anchor both teeth and implants. Once the bone was supportive, but now it is insufficient and must be restored. Specifically, the article examines different materials that aid in regeneration, as well as ones that do not. The pros and cons of osteoinduction and osteoconduction are compared. Autogenous, allographic, alloplastic, and xenographic materials are delineated and their intended purpose is described. These materials build the foundation of osseous support toward a functional future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12498538     DOI: 10.1563/1548-1336(2002)028<0290:BRGM>2.3.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  16 in total

1.  Tomographic and histometric analysis of autogenous bone block and synthetic hydroxyapatite block grafts without rigid fixation on rabbit calvaria.

Authors:  Soo-Yong Bae; Jung-Chul Park; Hyun-Seung Shin; Yong-Keun Lee; Seong-Ho Choi; Ui-Won Jung
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.614

2.  The Effect of Reduced Graphene Oxide-Coated Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Bone Graft Material on Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Jeong-Woo Kim; Yong Cheol Shin; Jin-Ju Lee; Eun-Bin Bae; Young-Chan Jeon; Chang-Mo Jeong; Mi-Jung Yun; So-Hyoun Lee; Dong-Wook Han; Jung-Bo Huh
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Volumetric analysis of bone substitute material performance within the human sinus cavity of former head and neck cancer patients: A prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Jonas Lorenz; Kathrin Eichler; Mike Barbeck; Henriette Lerner; Stefan Stübinger; Catherine Seipel; Thomas J Vogl; Adorján F Kovács; Shahram Ghanaati; Robert A Sader
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Dec

4.  Bone regeneration in ceramic scaffolds with variable concentrations of PDRN and rhBMP-2.

Authors:  Ho-Kyung Lim; Yeh-Jin Kwon; Seok-Jin Hong; Hyo-Geun Choi; Sung-Min Chung; Byoung-Eun Yang; Jong-Ho Lee; Soo-Hwan Byun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Dual delivery of BMP-2 and bFGF from a new nano-composite scaffold, loaded with vascular stents for large-size mandibular defect regeneration.

Authors:  Jiansheng Su; Hongzhen Xu; Jun Sun; Xue Gong; Hang Zhao
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Biomimetic helical rosette nanotubes and nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite coatings on titanium for improving orthopedic implants.

Authors:  Lijie Zhang; Yupeng Chen; Jose Rodriguez; Hicham Fenniri; Thomas J Webster
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2008

7.  Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanoparticulate crystalline hydroxyapatite functionalized with KRSR.

Authors:  Michael Nelson; Ganesan Balasundaram; Thomas J Webster
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2006

Review 8.  Nanomedicine applications in orthopedic medicine: state of the art.

Authors:  Mozhdeh Mazaheri; Niloofar Eslahi; Farideh Ordikhani; Elnaz Tamjid; Abdolreza Simchi
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-09-28

9.  Effect of hydroxyapatite on critical-sized defect.

Authors:  Ryoe-Woon Kim; Ji-Hyoung Kim; Seong-Yong Moon
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016-07-05

10.  Evaluation of photobiomodulation therapy associated with guided bone regeneration in critical size defects. In vivo study.

Authors:  Nicole Rosa de Freitas; Luísa Belluco Guerrini; Luis Augusto Esper; Michyele Cristhiane Sbrana; Gisele da Silva Dalben; Simone Soares; Ana Lúcia Pompéia Fraga de Almeida
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.