Literature DB >> 12496872

Receptor affinity and potency of non-steroidal antiandrogens: translation of preclinical findings into clinical activity.

G J C M Kolvenbag1, B J A Furr, G R P Blackledge.   

Abstract

The non-steroidal antiandrogens flutamide (Eulexin((R))), nilutamide (Anandron((R))) and bicalutamide (Casodex((R))) are widely used in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer, particularly in combination with castration. The naturally occurring ligand 5alpha-DHT has higher binding affinity at the androgen receptor than the non-steroidal antiandrogens. Bicalutamide has an affinity two to four times higher than 2-hydroxyflutamide, the active metabolite of flutamide, and around two times higher than nilutamide for wild-type rat and human prostate androgen receptors. Animal studies have indicated that bicalutamide also exhibits greater potency in reducing seminal vesicle and ventral prostate weights and inhibiting prostate tumour growth than flutamide. Although preclinical data can give an indication of the likely clinical activity, clinical studies are required to determine effective, well-tolerated dosing regimens. As components of combined androgen blockade (CAB), controlled studies have shown survival benefits of flutamide plus a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone analogue (LHRH-A) over LHRH-A alone, and for nilutamide plus orchiectomy over orchiectomy alone. Other studies have failed to show such survival benefits, including those comparing flutamide plus orchiectomy with orchiectomy alone, and nilutamide plus LHRH-A with LHRH-A alone. In a direct comparative study, bicalutamide (50 mg, once daily) was compared with flutamide (250 mg, three times daily), each in combination with an LHRH-A. Both therapies were well tolerated, although more patients could not tolerate flutamide therapy: 25 flutamide plus LHRH-A and 2 bicalutamide plus LHRH-A patients withdrew from therapy due to diarrhoea. There were no statistically significant differences for time to progression or survival between the two antiandrogens. This clinical trial of bicalutamide confirms the prediction from preclinical studies that a 50 mg dose of bicalutamide would be appropriate for use in patients with advanced prostate cancer, and demonstrates that this bicalutamide dose is clinically effective when administered as part of CAB.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 12496872     DOI: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis        ISSN: 1365-7852            Impact factor:   5.554


  14 in total

1.  Age disrupts androgen receptor-modulated negative feedback in the gonadal axis in healthy men.

Authors:  Johannes D Veldhuis; Paul Y Takahashi; Daniel M Keenan; Peter Y Liu; Kristi L Mielke; Suanne M Weist
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 4.310

2.  Distinct roles of age and abdominal visceral fat in reducing androgen receptor-dependent negative feedback on LH secretion in healthy men.

Authors:  P Y Takahashi; P Y Liu; J D Veldhuis
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.842

3.  Interactions of androgens, green tea catechins and the antiandrogen flutamide with the external glucose-binding site of the human erythrocyte glucose transporter GLUT1.

Authors:  Richard J Naftalin; Iram Afzal; Philip Cunningham; Mansur Halai; Clare Ross; Naguib Salleh; Stuart R Milligan
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2003-08-26       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Development of a second-generation antiandrogen for treatment of advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chris Tran; Samedy Ouk; Nicola J Clegg; Yu Chen; Philip A Watson; Vivek Arora; John Wongvipat; Peter M Smith-Jones; Dongwon Yoo; Andrew Kwon; Teresa Wasielewska; Derek Welsbie; Charlie Degui Chen; Celestia S Higano; Tomasz M Beer; David T Hung; Howard I Scher; Michael E Jung; Charles L Sawyers
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Enzalutamide, a second generation androgen receptor antagonist: development and clinical applications in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Manoj P Menon; Celestia S Higano
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Maintenance of intratumoral androgens in metastatic prostate cancer: a mechanism for castration-resistant tumor growth.

Authors:  R Bruce Montgomery; Elahe A Mostaghel; Robert Vessella; David L Hess; Thomas F Kalhorn; Celestia S Higano; Lawrence D True; Peter S Nelson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 7.  Management of docetaxel failures in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sumanta K Pal; Brian Lewis; Oliver Sartor
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 8.  Castration-resistant prostate cancer: targeting androgen metabolic pathways in recurrent disease.

Authors:  Elahe A Mostaghel; Bruce Montgomery; Peter S Nelson
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 9.  The importance of non-nuclear AR signaling in prostate cancer progression and therapeutic resistance.

Authors:  Jelani C Zarif; Cindy K Miranti
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 4.315

Review 10.  Targeting the androgen receptor pathway in castration-resistant prostate cancer: progresses and prospects.

Authors:  R Ferraldeschi; J Welti; J Luo; G Attard; J S de Bono
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 9.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.