Literature DB >> 12496069

Differences in electrostatic properties at antibody-antigen binding sites: implications for specificity and cross-reactivity.

Neeti Sinha1, Srinivasan Mohan, Claudia A Lipschultz, Sandra J Smith-Gill.   

Abstract

Antibodies HyHEL8, HyHEL10, and HyHEL26 (HH8, HH10, and HH26, respectively) recognize highly overlapping epitopes on hen egg-white lysozyme (HEL) with similar affinities, but with different specificities. HH8 binding to HEL is least sensitive toward mutations in the epitope and thus is most cross-reactive, HH26 is most sensitive, whereas the sensitivity of HH10 lies in between HH8 and HH26. Here we have investigated intra- and intermolecular interactions in three antibody-protein complexes: theoretical models of HH8-HEL and HH26-HEL complexes, and the x-ray crystal structure of HH10-HEL complex. Our results show that HH8-HEL has the lowest number and HH26-HEL has the highest number of intra- and intermolecular hydrogen bonds. The number of salt bridges is lowest in HH8-HEL and highest in HH26-HEL. The binding site salt bridges in HH8-HEL are not networked, and are weak, whereas, in HH26-HEL, an intramolecular salt-bridge triad at the binding site is networked to an intermolecular triad to form a pentad. The pentad and each salt bridge of this pentad are exceptionally stabilizing. The number of binding-site salt bridges and their strengths are intermediate in HH10-HEL, with an intramolecular triad. Our further calculations show that the electrostatic component contributes the most to binding energy of HH26-HEL, whereas the hydrophobic component contributes the most in the case of HH8-HEL. A "hot-spot" epitope residue Lys-97 forms an intermolecular salt bridge in HH8-HEL, and participates in the intermolecular pentad in the HH26-HEL complex. Mutant modeling and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) studies show that this hot-spot epitope residue contributes significantly more to the binding than an adjacent epitope residue, Lys-96, which does not form a salt bridge in any of the three HH-HEL complexes. Furthermore, the effect of mutating Lys-97 is most severe in HH26-HEL. Lys-96, being a charged residue, also contributes the most in HH26-HEL among the three complexes. The SPR results on these mutants also highlight that the apparent "electrostatic steering" on net on rates actually act at post-collision level stabilization of the complex. The significance of this work is the observed variations in electrostatic interactions among the three complexes. Our work demonstrates that higher electrostatics, both as a number of short-range electrostatic interactions and their contributions, leads to higher binding specificity. Strong salt bridges, their networking, and electrostatically driven binding, limit flexibilities through geometric constrains. In contrast, hydrophobic driven binding and low levels of electrostatic interactions are associated with conformational flexibility and cross-reactivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12496069      PMCID: PMC1302377          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75302-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  84 in total

1.  Enzyme flexibility: a new concept in recognition of hydrophobic substrates.

Authors:  S Kawaguchi; Y Nobe; J Yasuoka; T Wakamiya; S Kusumoto; S Kuramitsu
Journal:  J Biochem       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.387

2.  Insights into the molecular basis of thermal stability from the analysis of ion-pair networks in the glutamate dehydrogenase family.

Authors:  K S Yip; K L Britton; T J Stillman; J Lebbink; W M de Vos; F T Robb; C Vetriani; D Maeder; D W Rice
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1998-07-15

3.  Computation of electrostatic complements to proteins: a case of charge stabilized binding.

Authors:  L T Chong; S E Dempster; Z S Hendsch; L P Lee; B Tidor
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 4.  Let's get specific: the relationship between specificity and affinity.

Authors:  B E Eaton; L Gold; D A Zichi
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  1995-10

5.  Structural insights into the evolution of an antibody combining site.

Authors:  G J Wedemayer; P A Patten; L H Wang; P G Schultz; R C Stevens
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-06-13       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The kinetics of protein-protein recognition.

Authors:  J Janin
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1997-06

7.  Structure and mobility of the PUT3 dimer.

Authors:  K J Walters; K T Dayie; R J Reece; M Ptashne; G Wagner
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1997-09

8.  Hydrogen bonds and salt bridges across protein-protein interfaces.

Authors:  D Xu; C J Tsai; R Nussinov
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1997-09

9.  A mutational analysis of binding interactions in an antigen-antibody protein-protein complex.

Authors:  W Dall'Acqua; E R Goldman; W Lin; C Teng; D Tsuchiya; H Li; X Ysern; B C Braden; Y Li; S J Smith-Gill; R A Mariuzza
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1998-06-02       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  The entropy cost of protein association.

Authors:  A Tamura; P L Privalov
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-11-14       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  32 in total

1.  Potential aggregation-prone regions in complementarity-determining regions of antibodies and their contribution towards antigen recognition: a computational analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoling Wang; Satish K Singh; Sandeep Kumar
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Structure and functional features of olive pollen pectin methylesterase using homology modeling and molecular docking methods.

Authors:  Jose C Jimenez-Lopez; Simeon O Kotchoni; María I Rodríguez-García; Juan D Alché
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  The Potential Role of Solvation in Antibody Recognition of the Lewis Y Antigen.

Authors:  Somdutta Saha; Ramachandran Murali; Anastas Pashov; Thomas Kieber-Emmons
Journal:  Monoclon Antib Immunodiagn Immunother       Date:  2015-10

4.  A structurally based approach to determine HLA compatibility at the humoral immune level.

Authors:  Rene J Duquesnoy
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 2.850

5.  In silico modeling of pH-optimum of protein-protein binding.

Authors:  Rooplekha C Mitra; Zhe Zhang; Emil Alexov
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-12-22

6.  A computerized protein-protein interaction modeling study of ampicillin antibody specificity in relation to biosensor development.

Authors:  Minghua Wang; Jianping Wang
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 1.810

7.  Internal point mutations of the capsid modify the serotype of Rice yellow mottle virus.

Authors:  Eugénie Hébrard; Agnès Pinel-Galzi; Vincent Catherinot; Gilles Labesse; Christophe Brugidou; Denis Fargette
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  Characterization of mutants of a highly cross-reactive calcium-binding protein from Brassica pollen for allergen-specific immunotherapy.

Authors:  Tetiana Garmatiuk; Ines Swoboda; Anna Twardosz-Kropfmüller; Fabio Dall'Antonia; Walter Keller; Mohan B Singh; Prem L Bhalla; Takashi Okada; Kinya Toriyama; Milena Weber; Minoo Ghannadan; Wolfgang R Sperr; Katharina Blatt; Peter Valent; Brigitte Klein; Verena Niederberger; Mirela Curin; Nadja Balic; Susanne Spitzauer; Rudolf Valenta
Journal:  Immunobiology       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.144

9.  Structural functionality, catalytic mechanism modeling and molecular allergenicity of phenylcoumaran benzylic ether reductase, an olive pollen (Ole e 12) allergen.

Authors:  Jose C Jimenez-Lopez; Simeon O Kotchoni; Maria C Hernandez-Soriano; Emma W Gachomo; Juan D Alché
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 10.  Customizing monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of methamphetamine abuse: current and future applications.

Authors:  Eric C Peterson; W Brooks Gentry; S Michael Owens
Journal:  Adv Pharmacol       Date:  2014
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.