INTRODUCTION: Atrial dilatation may play an important role in the occurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in clinical situations. However, the electrophysiologic characteristics of dilated atria are still unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 18 isolated Langendorff-perfused canine hearts (14.6 +/- 2.2 kg), we measured atrial effective refractory periods (ERPs) at four different sites, conduction velocity and percentage of slow conduction on the right atrium (using a high-density electrode plaque), and assessed the inducibility of AF at the baseline (0 cm H(2)O) and high (15 cm H(2)O) atrial pressure. The atrial ERPs did not change significantly, but the dispersion of ERP increased significantly (40 +/- 18 vs 25 +/- 9 vs ms, p = 0.01) during high atrial pressure. The percentage of slow conduction (< 25 cm/s) over the mapping area, and the inducibility of AF increased during high atrial pressure (23.7 +/- 10.2 % vs 32.1 +/- 12.5 %, p = 0.02). The AF inducibility significantly correlated with the ERP dispersion (R = 0.75, p < 0.001) and maximal percentage of slow conduction (R = 0.88, p < 0.001). Furthermore, ERPs were significantly shorter in the induced AF group than those without induced AF (68 +/- 17 vs 84 +/- 16 ms, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The increased inhomogenity in atrial electrophysiological properties during atrial dilatation contributed to the inducibility of AF.
INTRODUCTION:Atrial dilatation may play an important role in the occurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in clinical situations. However, the electrophysiologic characteristics of dilated atria are still unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 18 isolated Langendorff-perfused canine hearts (14.6 +/- 2.2 kg), we measured atrial effective refractory periods (ERPs) at four different sites, conduction velocity and percentage of slow conduction on the right atrium (using a high-density electrode plaque), and assessed the inducibility of AF at the baseline (0 cm H(2)O) and high (15 cm H(2)O) atrial pressure. The atrial ERPs did not change significantly, but the dispersion of ERP increased significantly (40 +/- 18 vs 25 +/- 9 vs ms, p = 0.01) during high atrial pressure. The percentage of slow conduction (< 25 cm/s) over the mapping area, and the inducibility of AF increased during high atrial pressure (23.7 +/- 10.2 % vs 32.1 +/- 12.5 %, p = 0.02). The AF inducibility significantly correlated with the ERP dispersion (R = 0.75, p < 0.001) and maximal percentage of slow conduction (R = 0.88, p < 0.001). Furthermore, ERPs were significantly shorter in the induced AF group than those without induced AF (68 +/- 17 vs 84 +/- 16 ms, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The increased inhomogenity in atrial electrophysiological properties during atrial dilatation contributed to the inducibility of AF.
Authors: Ya-Jian Cheng; Di Lang; Shelton D Caruthers; Igor R Efimov; Junjie Chen; Samuel A Wickline Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2012-07-09 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Nathan C Denham; Charles M Pearman; Jessica L Caldwell; George W P Madders; David A Eisner; Andrew W Trafford; Katharine M Dibb Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2018-10-04 Impact factor: 4.566