M Tchirikov1, C Rybakowski, B Hüneke, V Schoder, H J Schröder. 1. Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Abteilung für Experimentelle Gynäkologie, Hamburg, Germany. tchiriko@uke.uni-hamburg.de
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic power of the umbilical venous-arterial index (VAI) for the prediction of poor fetal outcome. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional clinical study in which normalized umbilical vein blood volume flow rate (nUV) (mL/min/kg estimated body weight), umbilical artery pulsatility index (UAPI), the newly developed VAI (nUV/UAPI), and the uterine artery resistance index (UTRI) were determined in 85 fetuses once (17-41 gestational weeks) during pregnancy using standard ultrasound Doppler equipment. A risk score based on umbilical blood pH, 1-min Apgar score, birth weight, duration of gestation, type of respiratory support, and referral to the pediatric department was constructed, and fetuses were assigned to a control or a pathological group accordingly. Logistic regression and analysis of fitted receiver-operating characteristics curves were performed to evaluate the diagnostic power of nUV, UAPI, UTRI, and VAI. RESULTS: The incidence of compromised neonates was 17.6%. The area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve was larger for VAI than for UTRI or for UAPI (P < 0.002). At a cut-off value of 100 mL/min/kg, the sensitivity of VAI to predict poor neonatal outcome was 85% with a 15% false-positive rate. CONCLUSION: Determination of the VAI has a greater diagnostic power to predict poor fetal outcome than the pulsatility index in the umbilical artery or the resistance index in the uterine artery.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic power of the umbilical venous-arterial index (VAI) for the prediction of poor fetal outcome. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional clinical study in which normalized umbilical vein blood volume flow rate (nUV) (mL/min/kg estimated body weight), umbilical artery pulsatility index (UAPI), the newly developed VAI (nUV/UAPI), and the uterine artery resistance index (UTRI) were determined in 85 fetuses once (17-41 gestational weeks) during pregnancy using standard ultrasound Doppler equipment. A risk score based on umbilical blood pH, 1-min Apgar score, birth weight, duration of gestation, type of respiratory support, and referral to the pediatric department was constructed, and fetuses were assigned to a control or a pathological group accordingly. Logistic regression and analysis of fitted receiver-operating characteristics curves were performed to evaluate the diagnostic power of nUV, UAPI, UTRI, and VAI. RESULTS: The incidence of compromised neonates was 17.6%. The area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve was larger for VAI than for UTRI or for UAPI (P < 0.002). At a cut-off value of 100 mL/min/kg, the sensitivity of VAI to predict poor neonatal outcome was 85% with a 15% false-positive rate. CONCLUSION: Determination of the VAI has a greater diagnostic power to predict poor fetal outcome than the pulsatility index in the umbilical artery or the resistance index in the uterine artery.
Authors: André Dallmann; Ibrahim Ince; Michaela Meyer; Stefan Willmann; Thomas Eissing; Georg Hempel Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Zufei Zhang; Marjorie Z Imperial; Gabriela I Patilea-Vrana; Janak Wedagedera; Lu Gaohua; Jashvant D Unadkat Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: Miguel A Diego; Tiffany Field; Maria Hernandez-Reif; Saul Schanberg; Cynthia Kuhn; Victor Hugo Gonzalez-Quintero Journal: Early Hum Dev Date: 2008-08-23 Impact factor: 2.079
Authors: Stephen Z Pinter; Jonathan M Rubin; Oliver D Kripfgans; Marjorie C Treadwell; Vivian C Romero; Michael S Richards; Man Zhang; Anne L Hall; J Brian Fowlkes Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Jonathan M Rubin; Sibo Li; J Brian Fowlkes; Shriram Sethuraman; Oliver D Kripfgans; William Shi; Marjorie C Treadwell; James R Jago; Ronald D Leichner; Stephen Z Pinter Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2020-08-07 Impact factor: 2.153