D W Paquette1, D M Simpson, P Friden, V Braman, R C Williams. 1. Department of Periodontology, Comprehensive Center for Inflammatory Disorders, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA. David_Paquette@dentistry.unc.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Our research group has recently reported that exogenously applied histatins can inhibit plaque accumulation and gingival inflammation in a preclinical canine model (Paquette et al. 1997). OBJECTIVES: The aims of the present double-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial were to evaluate the safety and toxicity of three histatin (P-113) concentrations in gel formulations, and to assess potential clinical benefit on the development of gingivitis (partial mouth design). MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and six healthy subjects were recruited and brought to optimal gingival health (GI < 0.5) prior to treatment initiation. At baseline, eligible subjects were randomized for one of the following treatments: (1) placebo; (2) 0.0625% P-113; (3) 0.125% P-113; and (4) 0.375% P-113. Patients self-applied gels twice daily for 29 days to the maxillary right quadrant with the use of customized stents. In addition, patients deferred all oral hygiene procedures within this quadrant for the duration of the treatment period. Safety was assessed in terms of physical and oral examinations, clinical laboratory testing and recording of adverse events. Clinical indices were measured weekly and included gingival index (GI), plaque index (PI) and %BOP. RESULTS: All study formulations were well tolerated by patients, and no differences in adverse event occurrences were noted among treatment groups, including taste alteration or staining. For the intent-to-treat population, significantly smaller %BOP changes were noted in subjects treated with 0.0625, 0.125 and 0.375% P-113 gels (17.4, 18.18 and 17.9%, respectively) versus placebo (28.0%) (p < 0.05) at day 29. When groups were compared in terms of per cent responders (change in %BOP < 15 or < 20%), P-113 treatment groups exhibited a higher frequency of response, especially for the 0.0625 and 0.125% P-113 formulations (p < 0.05). Although no statistically significant intergroup differences were noted for changes in GI or PI among all subjects (intent-to-treat population), significantly smaller changes in PI at day 22 were observed among compliant individuals (defined as subjects using > 60% of the target gel mass) administering P-113 gels as compared with compliant placebo subjects (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate safety and tolerance of P-113 gels for topical oral use in human subjects. These data also suggest that P-113 gels administered twice daily may reduce experimental gingivitis as measured with bleeding on probing in humans.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Our research group has recently reported that exogenously applied histatins can inhibit plaque accumulation and gingival inflammation in a preclinical canine model (Paquette et al. 1997). OBJECTIVES: The aims of the present double-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial were to evaluate the safety and toxicity of three histatin (P-113) concentrations in gel formulations, and to assess potential clinical benefit on the development of gingivitis (partial mouth design). MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and six healthy subjects were recruited and brought to optimal gingival health (GI < 0.5) prior to treatment initiation. At baseline, eligible subjects were randomized for one of the following treatments: (1) placebo; (2) 0.0625% P-113; (3) 0.125% P-113; and (4) 0.375% P-113. Patients self-applied gels twice daily for 29 days to the maxillary right quadrant with the use of customized stents. In addition, patients deferred all oral hygiene procedures within this quadrant for the duration of the treatment period. Safety was assessed in terms of physical and oral examinations, clinical laboratory testing and recording of adverse events. Clinical indices were measured weekly and included gingival index (GI), plaque index (PI) and %BOP. RESULTS: All study formulations were well tolerated by patients, and no differences in adverse event occurrences were noted among treatment groups, including taste alteration or staining. For the intent-to-treat population, significantly smaller %BOP changes were noted in subjects treated with 0.0625, 0.125 and 0.375% P-113 gels (17.4, 18.18 and 17.9%, respectively) versus placebo (28.0%) (p < 0.05) at day 29. When groups were compared in terms of per cent responders (change in %BOP < 15 or < 20%), P-113 treatment groups exhibited a higher frequency of response, especially for the 0.0625 and 0.125% P-113 formulations (p < 0.05). Although no statistically significant intergroup differences were noted for changes in GI or PI among all subjects (intent-to-treat population), significantly smaller changes in PI at day 22 were observed among compliant individuals (defined as subjects using > 60% of the target gel mass) administering P-113 gels as compared with compliant placebo subjects (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate safety and tolerance of P-113 gels for topical oral use in human subjects. These data also suggest that P-113 gels administered twice daily may reduce experimental gingivitis as measured with bleeding on probing in humans.
Authors: Antonio Moretta; Carmen Scieuzo; Anna Maria Petrone; Rosanna Salvia; Michele Dario Manniello; Antonio Franco; Donatella Lucchetti; Antonio Vassallo; Heiko Vogel; Alessandro Sgambato; Patrizia Falabella Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Date: 2021-06-14 Impact factor: 5.293
Authors: Huy Xuan Luong; Hoa Doan Ngan; Hai Bui Thi Phuong; Thang Nguyen Quoc; Truong Thanh Tung Journal: R Soc Open Sci Date: 2022-01-26 Impact factor: 2.963