Literature DB >> 12492826

Do we really help? Perspectives of abused women.

Melanie Lutenbacher1, Alison Cohen, Julia Mitzel.   

Abstract

Findings are presented from focus group data collected during a larger study describing factors that inhibit, support, and sustain women's abilities to leave and stay out of abusive relationships. A subset (n = 24) of the larger study sample (N = 40) participated in one of four focus groups. Participants had left or were currently in abusive intimate relationships. Women reported diverse experiences and were in various stages of abusive relationships. Ages ranged from 21 to 51; 67% were Caucasian, and 20% African American. Most women (71%) had at least a high school education and were employed (60%), but 83% reported annual incomes less than $20,000. NVIVO software facilitated content analysis of transcriptions. After initial synthesis of data, 20 women participated in one of two confirmatory focus groups. Four primary themes emerged from the content analysis: (1) Living an Unnatural Experience included maladaptive physical and emotional responses to chronic violence; (2) The Experience of Telling included multiple intrapersonal, interpersonal, and societal barriers to disclosure; (3) The Experience of Leaving included descriptions of acute and long-term experiences and difficulties; and (4) Reducing Barriers included participant ideas on ways to reduce barriers to assistance. Recommendations are made to improve community interventions and programs that will facilitate the choices and enhance the successes of women who have experienced domestic violence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12492826     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1446.2003.20108.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Nurs        ISSN: 0737-1209            Impact factor:   1.462


  7 in total

1.  Screening for Food Insecurity in Pediatric Clinical Settings: Opportunities and Barriers.

Authors:  Ellen Barnidge; Gene LaBarge; Kathryn Krupsky; Joshua Arthur
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2017-02

2.  Utility of STaT for the identification of recent intimate partner violence.

Authors:  Anuradha Paranjape; Kimberly Rask; Jane Liebschutz
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  The Intimate Partner Violence Stigmatization Model and Barriers to Help-Seeking.

Authors:  Nicole M Overstreet; Diane M Quinn
Journal:  Basic Appl Soc Psych       Date:  2013-02-04

4.  Recent partner violence and sexual and drug-related STI/HIV risk among adolescent and young adult women attending family planning clinics.

Authors:  Michele R Decker; Elizabeth Miller; Heather L McCauley; Daniel J Tancredi; Heather Anderson; Rebecca R Levenson; Jay G Silverman
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  Food Insecurity Screening in Pediatric Clinical Settings: A Caregivers' Perspective.

Authors:  Ellen Barnidge; Kathryn Krupsky; Gene LaBarge; Joshua Arthur
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2020-01

6.  Acceptance of routine or case-based inquiry for intimate partner violence: a mixed method study.

Authors:  Heidi Stöckl; Linda Hertlein; Isabelle Himsl; Nina Ditsch; Carolin Blume; Uwe Hasbargen; Klaus Friese; Doris Stöckl
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Disclosure of abuse among female patients within general psychiatric care - a cross sectional study.

Authors:  K Örmon; C Sunnqvist; C Bahtsevani; M Torstensson Levander
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.630

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.