Literature DB >> 12492669

A comparison of simulated difficult intubation with multiple-use and single-use bougies in a manikin.

R Annamaneni1, I Hodzovic, A R Wilkes, I P Latto.   

Abstract

In a randomised cross-over study, 20 anaesthetists attempted to place a multiple- or single-use bougie in the trachea of a manikin, in which a grade 3 Cormack and Lehane laryngoscopic view was simulated. The anaesthetists made two attempts at placement with each bougie and were blinded to success (tracheal placement) or failure (oesophageal placement). The success rates for the first attempts with the multiple- and single-use bougies were 85 and 15%, respectively [mean (95% CI) difference between the two bougies 70% (40-84%); p < 0.001]. The success rates for the second attempts were similar to those for the first attempts with both bougies. There is an increased risk of failure to intubate the trachea when using a single-use bougie, and this must be weighed against the unquantified risk of cross-infection from prions when using a multiple-use bougie.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12492669     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.02871.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  3 in total

1.  Capnography and oxygenation via single-use bougie.

Authors:  Rajesh Mahajan; Anju Sharma; Firdos Shafi
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 2.  Airway Leads and Airway Response Teams: Improving Delivery of Safer Airway Management?

Authors:  Carolyn Smith; Alistair F McNarry
Journal:  Curr Anesthesiol Rep       Date:  2020-07-20

3.  Comparison of conventional C-MAC video laryngoscope guided intubation by anesthesia trainees with and without Frova endotracheal introducer: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Meenupriya Arasu; Priya Rudingwa; M V S Satyaprakash; Sakthirajan Panneerselvam; Aswini Kuberan
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-01-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.