Literature DB >> 12492436

mGluR1 in cerebellar Purkinje cells is required for normal association of temporally contiguous stimuli in classical conditioning.

Yasushi Kishimoto1, Ryoko Fujimichi, Kenji Araishi, Shigenori Kawahara, Masanobu Kano, Atsu Aiba, Yutaka Kirino.   

Abstract

In metabotropic glutamate receptor-subtype 1 (mGluR1)-null (mGluR1-/-) mice, cerebellar long-term depression (LTD) and several forms of memory are impaired. However, because mGluR1 is expressed in various brain regions in wild-type mice, it has been difficult to identify which type of memory depends on mGluR1 expressed in a given brain region. Furthermore, severe ataxia in mGluR1-/- mice complicated interpretation of the data from non-cerebellum-dependent tasks. We have generated mGluR1-rescue mice, which express mGluR1 only in Purkinje cells (PCs) of their cerebellum, by introducing the mGluR1alpha transgene into mGluR1-/- mice under the control of a PC-specific promoter. The mGluR1-rescue mouse has normal LTD and displays no apparent ataxia. Therefore, this mouse is the first animal model in which effects of mGluR1 deficiency outside PCs can be studied without cerebellar dysfunction. We used three eyeblink conditioning paradigms with different temporal specificities between conditioned stimulus (CS) and unconditioned stimulus (US). Delay conditioning, in which CS and US coterminate, was impaired in mGluR1-/- mice but normal in mGluR1-rescue mice. However, both strains of mice displayed severe impairment in trace conditionings, in which a stimulus-free interval of 250 or 500 ms intervened between CS and US. We also examined social transmission of food-preference and novel-object-recognition memory tests. In these tasks, mGluR1-rescue mice showed normal short-term but impaired long-term memory. We conclude that mGluR1 in PCs is indispensable for normal learning of association of temporally contiguous stimuli in associative conditioning. In contrast, mGluR1 in other cell types is required for associating discontiguous stimuli and long-term memory formation in nonspatial hippocampus-dependent learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12492436     DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02407.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  36 in total

1.  Molecular evidence for two-stage learning and partial laterality in eyeblink conditioning of mice.

Authors:  Jin-Sung Park; Takashi Onodera; Shin-ichi Nishimura; Richard F Thompson; Shigeyoshi Itohara
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Kinetic, pharmacological and activity-dependent separation of two Ca2+ signalling pathways mediated by type 1 metabotropic glutamate receptors in rat Purkinje neurones.

Authors:  Marco Canepari; David Ogden
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Timing dependence of the induction of cerebellar LTD.

Authors:  Patrick Safo; Wade G Regehr
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 5.250

4.  Dual involvement of G-substrate in motor learning revealed by gene deletion.

Authors:  Shogo Endo; Fumihiro Shutoh; Tung Le Dinh; Takehito Okamoto; Toshio Ikeda; Michiyuki Suzuki; Shigenori Kawahara; Dai Yanagihara; Yamato Sato; Kazuyuki Yamada; Toshiro Sakamoto; Yutaka Kirino; Nicholas A Hartell; Kazuhiko Yamaguchi; Shigeyoshi Itohara; Angus C Nairn; Paul Greengard; Soichi Nagao; Masao Ito
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Cerebellar and extracerebellar involvement in mouse eyeblink conditioning: the ACDC model.

Authors:  Henk-Jan Boele; Sebastiaan K E Koekkoek; Chris I De Zeeuw
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 5.505

6.  Cerebellar-dependent expression of motor learning during eyeblink conditioning in head-fixed mice.

Authors:  Shane A Heiney; Margot P Wohl; Selmaan N Chettih; Luis I Ruffolo; Javier F Medina
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Autoshaped head poking in the mouse: a quantitative analysis of the learning curve.

Authors:  Efstathios B Papachristos; C R Gallistel
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The synaptic targeting of mGluR1 by its carboxyl-terminal domain is crucial for cerebellar function.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Ohtani; Mariko Miyata; Kouichi Hashimoto; Toshihide Tabata; Yasushi Kishimoto; Masahiro Fukaya; Daisuke Kase; Hidetoshi Kassai; Kazuki Nakao; Tatsumi Hirata; Masahiko Watanabe; Masanobu Kano; Atsu Aiba
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Unimpaired trace classical eyeblink conditioning in Purkinje cell degeneration (pcd) mutant mice.

Authors:  Kevin L Brown; Alexis Agelan; Diana S Woodruff-Pak
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2009-11-29       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  Conditioned eyeblink learning is formed and stored without cerebellar granule cell transmission.

Authors:  Norio Wada; Yasushi Kishimoto; Dai Watanabe; Masanobu Kano; Tomoo Hirano; Kazuo Funabiki; Shigetada Nakanishi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-08       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.