Literature DB >> 12492281

Effects of medetomidine-midazolam, acepromazine-butorphanol, and midazolam-butorphanol on induction dose of thiopental and propofol and on cardiopulmonary changes in dogs.

Kentaro Kojima1, Ryohei Nishimura, Tatsushi Mutoh, Sung-Hyeok Hong, Manabu Mochizuki, Nobuo Sasaki.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate dose-sparing effects of medetomidine-midazolam (MM), acepromazine-butorphanol (AB), and midazolam-butorphanol (MB) on the induction dose of thiopental and propofol and to examine cardiopulmonary changes in dogs. ANIMALS: 23 healthy Beagles. PROCEDURE: Dogs were administered MM, AB, MB, or physiologic saline (0.9% NaCI) solution (PS) IM, and anesthesia was induced with thiopental or propofol. Cardiopulmonary measurements were obtained before and after administration of medication and 0, 5, 10, and 15 minutes after endotracheal intubation.
RESULTS: Induction doses were reduced significantly by preanesthetic administration of MM, AB, and MB (thiopental, 20, 45, and 46% after administration of PS; propofol, 42, 58, and 74% after administration of PS, respectively). Recovery time in dogs administered MM-thiopental or MM-propofol and AB-propofol were significantly prolonged, compared with recovery time in dogs administered PS-thiopental or PS-propofol. Relatively large cardiovascular changes were induced by administration of MM, which were sustained even after the induction of anesthesia. Administration of AB and MB induced cardiovascular changes during and immediately after endotracheal intubation that were significantly decreased by induction with thiopental or propofol. However, mild hypotension developed with AB-propofol. Apnea was observed in dogs administered MM during induction of anesthesia, but most respiratory variables did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Preanesthetic medication with MM greatly reduced the anesthesia induction dose of thiopental and propofol but caused noticeable cardiopulmonary changes. Preanesthetic medication with AB and MB moderately reduced the induction dose of thiopental and propofol and amelio rated cardiovascular changes induced by these anesthetics, although AB caused mild hypotension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12492281     DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2002.63.1671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Vet Res        ISSN: 0002-9645            Impact factor:   1.156


  4 in total

1.  Effects of acepromazine or methadone on midazolam-induced behavioral reactions in dogs.

Authors:  Bradley T Simon; Elizabeth M Scallan; Carlo Siracusa; Amy Henderson; Meg M Sleeper; M Paula Larenza Menzies
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Effects of medetomidine and midazolam alone or in combination on the metabolic and neurohormonal responses in healthy cats.

Authors:  Teppei Kanda; Yoshiaki Hikasa
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.310

3.  Dose sparing of induction dose of propofol by fentanyl and butorphanol: A comparison based on entropy analysis.

Authors:  Jasleen Kaur; Moningi Srilata; Durga Padmaja; Ramchandran Gopinath; Sukhminder Jit Singh Bajwa; Dorairay John Kenneth; Parasa Sujay Kumar; Chalumuru Nitish; Wudaru Sreedhar Reddy
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2013-04

4.  Cardiopulmonary effects of thiopental versus propofol as an induction agent prior to isoflurane anesthesia in chair trained rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Yun-Jung Choi; Hye-Jin Park; Hyeon-Ho Kim; Yun-Jin Lee; Kyeong-Cheon Jung; Seong-Hoe Park; Jae-Il Lee
Journal:  Lab Anim Res       Date:  2016-03-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.