Literature DB >> 12490139

T lymphocytes are direct, aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR)-dependent targets of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD): AhR expression in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells is necessary for full suppression of a cytotoxic T lymphocyte response by TCDD.

Nancy I Kerkvliet1, David M Shepherd, Linda Baecher-Steppan.   

Abstract

The cellular basis for the potent suppression of T cell-mediated immune responses in mice following exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) is not fully understood. Although activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is required, the specific AhR+ cells that transduce the suppression have been difficult to identify in vivo. The recent availability of AhR-/- mutant mice has provided a resource for novel approaches to investigate the direct targets of TCDD. In our studies, we used an in vivo acute graft versus host (GVH) model of T cell immunity to address the direct AhR-dependent effects of TCDD on T cells. In this model, T cells from C57B1/6 mice are injected into C57B1/6 x DBA/2 F1 host mice. The injected T cells recognize the MHC disparity of the host cells, resulting in the generation of an antihost cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response. By comparing the ability of TCDD to suppress the CTL response of T cells obtained from AhR+/+ and AhR-/- C57B1/6 mice, the need for AhR expression in T cells themselves could be assessed. The results of these studies showed that the CTL response of T cells from AhR+/+ mice was highly suppressed when the F1 host mice were treated with 15 microg/kg TCDD. TCDD treatment also protected the F1 host mice from the loss of body weight that accompanies the induction of the GVH response. In contrast, when grafted T cells were derived from AhR-/- mice, there was no suppression of the CTL response by TCDD, and the host animals lost significant body weight. Furthermore, when T cells from AhR+/+ and AhR-/- mice were separated into CD4+ and CD8+ subsets and recombined using one subset from each donor prior to injection into the F1 host, suppression of the CTL response by TCDD was still apparent, but the degree of suppression was significantly reduced when either subset was AhR-/-. These results indicate that direct AhR-dependent effects of TCDD occur in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets and both T cell subsets contribute to the full suppression of the CTL response by TCDD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12490139     DOI: 10.1006/taap.2002.9537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol        ISSN: 0041-008X            Impact factor:   4.219


  41 in total

1.  Activation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor by TCDD prevents diabetes in NOD mice and increases Foxp3+ T cells in pancreatic lymph nodes.

Authors:  Nancy I Kerkvliet; Linda B Steppan; William Vorachek; Shannon Oda; David Farrer; Carmen P Wong; Duy Pham; Dan V Mourich
Journal:  Immunotherapy       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.196

2.  Consequences of AhR activation in steady-state dendritic cells.

Authors:  Tom Simones; David M Shepherd
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  The aryl hydrocarbon receptor affects distinct tissue compartments during ontogeny of the immune system.

Authors:  Jason P Hogaboam; Amanda J Moore; B Paige Lawrence
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptor targets pathways extrinsic to bone marrow cells to enhance neutrophil recruitment during influenza virus infection.

Authors:  Sabine Teske; Andrea A Bohn; Jason P Hogaboam; B Paige Lawrence
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 5.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands in cancer: friend and foe.

Authors:  Iain A Murray; Andrew D Patterson; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  The aryl hydrocarbon receptor is required for optimal resistance to Listeria monocytogenes infection in mice.

Authors:  Lewis Zhichang Shi; Nancy G Faith; Yumi Nakayama; Makulasiddappa Suresh; Howard Steinberg; Charles J Czuprynski
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 5.422

7.  Activation of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor by 10-Cl-BBQ Prevents Insulitis and Effector T Cell Development Independently of Foxp3+ Regulatory T Cells in Nonobese Diabetic Mice.

Authors:  Allison K Ehrlich; Jamie M Pennington; Xisheng Wang; Diana Rohlman; Sumit Punj; Christiane V Löhr; Matthew T Newman; Siva K Kolluri; Nancy I Kerkvliet
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 5.422

8.  Disruption of human plasma cell differentiation by an environmental polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon: a mechanistic immunotoxicological study.

Authors:  Lenka L Allan; David H Sherr
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 5.984

9.  Activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor is essential for mediating the anti-inflammatory effects of a novel low-molecular-weight compound.

Authors:  B Paige Lawrence; Michael S Denison; Hermann Novak; Beth A Vorderstrasse; Nathalie Harrer; Wolfgang Neruda; Claudia Reichel; Maximilian Woisetschläger
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Activation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor prolongs survival of fully mismatched cardiac allografts.

Authors:  Lan-Jun Cai; Dao-Wu Yu; Yi Gao; Chao Yang; Hong-Min Zhou; Zhong-Hua Klaus Chen
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2013-04-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.