Literature DB >> 12489766

How do the internal details of the object contribute to recognition?

Hidemichi Mitsumatsu1, Kazuhiko Yokosawa.   

Abstract

Object recognition becomes difficult when the main axis of the object is foreshortened. It has previously been reported that this so-called foreshortened disadvantage is larger when the silhouette of the object is presented than when the line drawing of the object is presented. The pronounced foreshortened disadvantage in silhouette recognition indicates that the internal details of the object, which are absent in the silhouette, provide useful information, particularly when the main axis is foreshortened. But the role of these internal details remains controversial. One account for the pronounced disadvantage is that the internal details contribute to the derivation of the main axis. The other account is that internal details provide the distinctive features that are directly matched to the object represented in memory. The aim in the present study was to determine which of these two explanations best accounts for the differential foreshortened disadvantage between line drawings and silhouettes. To reduce the uncertainty regarding the axis orientation, a 3-D arrow indicating the orientation of the main axis was presented as a cue before the object itself was presented. As a result, the difference in the foreshortened disadvantage between silhouettes and line drawings disappeared. This indicated that the pronounced foreshortened disadvantage for silhouettes was caused by a lack of axis information. In other words, the internal details provided the information necessary for axis derivation when the axis was foreshortened.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12489766     DOI: 10.1068/p3421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  6 in total

1.  On the three-quarter view advantage of familiar object recognition.

Authors:  Kohei Nonose; Ryosuke Niimi; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-09-21

2.  Determining the orientation of depth-rotated familiar objects.

Authors:  Ryosuke Niimi; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-02

3.  Three-quarter views are subjectively good because object orientation is uncertain.

Authors:  Ryosuke Niimi; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

4.  Contextual effects of scene on the visual perception of object orientation in depth.

Authors:  Ryosuke Niimi; Katsumi Watanabe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Learning the 3-D structure of objects from 2-D views depends on shape, not format.

Authors:  Moqian Tian; Daniel Yamins; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Effect of silhouetting and inversion on view invariance in the monkey inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  N Apurva Ratan Murty; S P Arun
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 2.714

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.