Literature DB >> 12488300

Biweekly high-dose gemcitabine alone or in combination with capecitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a randomized phase II trial.

W Scheithauer1, B Schüll, H Ulrich-Pur, K Schmid, M Raderer, K Haider, W Kwasny, D Depisch, B Schneeweiss, F Lang, G V Kornek.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine is an active antitumor agent in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer, and has shown potential synergistic activity with the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine in previous phase I/II trials. Based on this background and in order to define the therapeutic potential and tolerance of this combination more precisely, the present randomized multicenter phase II trial was initiated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively randomized 83 patients to treatment with biweekly gemcitabine 2,200 mg/m(2) given as a 30 min intravenous infusion on day 1, or the same treatment plus oral capecitabine 2,500 mg/m(2) given from days 1 to 7. In both arms, chemotherapy was administered for a duration of 6 months unless there was prior evidence of progressive disease. The efficacy of the two treatment arms was evaluated according to standard criteria, i.e. objective response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), as well as by analysis of clinical benefit response.
RESULTS: The overall objective response rate among the 42 patients treated with gemcitabine alone was 14% compared with 7/41 (17%) among those treated with the combination arm. Similar to response rates, there was no apparent difference between the two groups in terms of median PFS (4.0 versus 5.1 months) and median OS (8.2 versus 9.5 months) in the gemcitabine and combination arm, respectively. Of 61 patients with tumor-related symptoms, who were considered evaluable for clinical benefit response, 10/30 (33%) and 15/31 (48.4%) experienced significant palliation in the gemcitabine and combination arm, respectively. Chemotherapy was well tolerated in both arms with only four versus six patients experiencing WHO grade 3 symptoms. Apart from the occurrence of hand-foot syndrome in 10 patients, no major increase in incidence and/or degree of adverse reactions was noted in the combination arm.
CONCLUSIONS: Results of this trial suggest a fairly good therapeutic index for the combination of biweekly high-dose gemcitabine and capecitabine for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. Despite a somewhat superior clinical benefit response rate, no advantage over single-agent gemcitabine, however, was noted in terms of objective efficacy parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12488300     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdg029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  47 in total

Review 1.  Developments in metastatic pancreatic cancer: is gemcitabine still the standard?

Authors:  Jie-Er Ying; Li-Ming Zhu; Bi-Xia Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Preclinical Rationale for the Phase III Trials in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Is Wishful Thinking Clouding Successful Drug Development for Pancreatic Cancer?

Authors:  Ramya Thota; Anirban Maitra; Jordan D Berlin
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 3.  The Triple-Code Model for Pancreatic Cancer: Cross Talk Among Genetics, Epigenetics, and Nuclear Structure.

Authors:  Gwen A Lomberk; Raul Urrutia
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 4.  Chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Gregory Friberg; Hedy Lee Kindler
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  A phase II trial of gemcitabine and weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil in a 48-hour continuous-infusion schedule in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma. A study of the Spanish Cooperative Group for Gastrointestinal Tumour Therapy (TTD).

Authors:  Joan Maurel Santasusana; José Luis García López; Juan José García; Ana Isabel León Carbonero; Javier Gallego Plazas; Pedro Sánchez Rovira; Carlos Fernández Martos; M Carmen Galán Guzmán; Jesús Florián Jericó; Francisco Javier Dorta Delgado; Javier Casinello Espinosa; Marta Llanos Muñoz; Enrique Aranda Aguilar; Javier Sastre Valera; Ignacio García Ribas; Alfredo Carrato Mena
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Chemotherapy: Gemcitabine remains the standard of care for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Jordan Berlin; Al B Benson
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Advanced pancreatic cancer - how to choose an adequate treatment option.

Authors:  Eija A Korkeila
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Metformin and survival in pancreatic cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Allen L Hwang; Kevin Haynes; Wei-Ting Hwang; Yu-Xiao Yang
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.327

9.  Radical treatment of stage IV pancreatic cancer by the combination of cryosurgery and iodine-125 seed implantation.

Authors:  Ji-Bing Chen; Jia-Liang Li; Li-Hua He; Wei-Qun Liu; Fei Yao; Jian-Ying Zeng; Yi Zhang; Ke-Qiang Xu; Li-Zhi Niu; Jian-Sheng Zuo; Ke-Cheng Xu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing gemcitabine-based doublets versus gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Eugeniu Banu; Adela Banu; Andrei Fodor; Bruno Landi; Philippe Rougier; Gilles Chatellier; Jean-Marie Andrieu; Stephane Oudard
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.