Literature DB >> 12487684

Usability of the revised NIOSH lifting equation.

Patrick G Dempsey1.   

Abstract

Following the revision of the 1981 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) lifting equation, research needs related to the new equation were outlined. Aside from epidemiological studies, the need to evaluate the usability of the 1991 NIOSH equation in realistic work environments was expressed. This paper reports on extensive experiences with training users and application of the equation in varied work settings. Qualitative results from training sessions indicated that frequency, asymmetry and duration were the parameters that required relatively longer instruction periods and resulted in the most questions. Field applications indicated that the variable nature of lifting/lowering demands found in many jobs resulted in difficulty applying the equation. Approximately 35% of 1103 lifting and lowering tasks had at least one parameter outside of acceptable ranges, while a majority of workers (62.8%) reported other manual handling tasks that are counter to assumptions made in the development of the equation. The practical implications of the findings are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12487684     DOI: 10.1080/00140130210159977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  8 in total

1.  Load Asymmetry Angle Estimation Using Multiple view Videos.

Authors:  Xuan Wang; Yu Hen Hu; Ming-Lun Lu; Robert G Radwin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 4.124

2.  Assessment of a Passive Lumbar Exoskeleton in Material Manual Handling Tasks under Laboratory Conditions.

Authors:  Sofía Iranzo; Alicia Piedrabuena; Fernando García-Torres; Jose Luis Martinez-de-Juan; Gema Prats-Boluda; Mercedes Sanchis; Juan-Manuel Belda-Lois
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 3.  Evaluation of the Impact of the Revised National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Lifting Equation.

Authors:  Ming-Lun Lu; Vern Putz-Anderson; Arun Garg; Kermit G Davis
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.888

4.  Automation of workplace lifting hazard assessment for musculoskeletal injury prevention.

Authors:  June T Spector; Max Lieblich; Stephen Bao; Kevin McQuade; Margaret Hughes
Journal:  Ann Occup Environ Med       Date:  2014-06-24

5.  Mechanical lifting energy consumption in work activities designed by means of the "revised NIOSH lifting equation".

Authors:  Alberto Ranavolo; Tiwana Varrecchia; Martina Rinaldi; Alessio Silvetti; Mariano Serrao; Silvia Conforto; Francesco Draicchio
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.179

6.  Wearable Monitoring Devices for Biomechanical Risk Assessment at Work: Current Status and Future Challenges-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ranavolo Alberto; Francesco Draicchio; Tiwana Varrecchia; Alessio Silvetti; Sergio Iavicoli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Centre of pressure parameters for the assessment of biomechanical risk in fatiguing frequency-dependent lifting activities.

Authors:  Carmen D'Anna; Tiwana Varrecchia; Alberto Ranavolo; Alessandro Marco De Nunzio; Deborah Falla; Francesco Draicchio; Silvia Conforto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Essential Occupational Safety and Health Interventions for Low- and Middle-income Countries: An Overview of the Evidence.

Authors:  Jos Verbeek; Ivan Ivanov
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2013-04-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.