Literature DB >> 12487302

Comparing PAH availability from manufactured gas plant soils and sediments with chemical and biological tests. 1. PAH release during water desorption and supercritical carbon dioxide extraction.

Steven B Hawthorne1, Dustin G Poppendieck, Carol B Grabanski, Raymond C Loehr.   

Abstract

Soil and sediment samples from oil gas (OG) and coal gas (CG) manufactured gas plant (MGP) sites were selected to represent a range of PAH concentrations (150-40,000 mg/kg) and sample matrix compositions. Samples varied from vegetated soils to lampblack soot and had carbon contents from 3 to 87 wt %. SFE desorption (120 min) and water/XAD2 desorption (120 days) curves were determined and fit with a simple two-site model to determine the rapid-released fraction (F) for PAHs ranging from naphthalene to benzo[ghi]perylene. F values varied greatly among the samples, from ca. 10% to >90% for the two- and three-ring PAHs and from <1% to ca. 50% for the five- and six-ring PAHs. Release rates did not correlate with sample matrix characteristics including PAH concentrations, elemental composition (C, H, N, S), or "hard" and "softs" organic carbon, indicating that PAH release cannot easily be estimated on the basis of sample matrix composition. Fvalues for CG site samples obtained with SFE and water desorption agreed well (linear correlation coefficient, r2 = 0.87, slope = 0.93), but SFE yielded higher F values for the OG samples. These behaviors were attributed to the stronger ability of carbon dioxide than water to desorb PAHs from the highly aromatic (hard) carbon of the OG matrixes, while carbon dioxide and water showed similar abilities to desorb PAHs from the more polar (soft) carbon of the CG samples. The combined SFE and water desorption approaches should improve the understanding of PAH sequestration and release from contaminated soils and sediments and provide the basis for subsequent studies using the same samples to compare PAH release with PAH availability to earthworms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12487302     DOI: 10.1021/es020626k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  7 in total

1.  Impact of reference geosorbents on oral bioaccessibility of PAH in a human in vitro digestive tract model.

Authors:  Wiebke Meyer; Sandra Kons; Christine Achten
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Desorption and bioavailability of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in contaminated soil subjected to long-term in situ biostimulation.

Authors:  Stephen D Richardson; Michael D Aitken
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 3.  The impact of biochars on sorption and biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soils--a review.

Authors:  Chinedum Anyika; Zaiton Abdul Majid; Zahara Ibrahim; Mohamad Pauzi Zakaria; Adibah Yahya
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Aerobic Bioremediation of PAH Contaminated Soil Results in Increased Genotoxicity and Developmental Toxicity.

Authors:  Leah Chibwe; Mitra C Geier; Jun Nakamura; Robert L Tanguay; Michael D Aitken; Staci L Massey Simonich
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Assessment of the bioavailability and phytotoxicity of sediment spiked with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

Authors:  Srđan Rončević; Jelena Spasojević; Snežana Maletić; Jelena Molnar Jazić; Marijana Kragulj Isakovski; Jasmina Agbaba; Marko Grgić; Božo Dalmacija
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 6.  Naphthalene--an environmental and occupational toxicant.

Authors:  Ralf Preuss; Jürgen Angerer; Hans Drexler
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  Predicting polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon concentrations in resident aquatic organisms using passive samplers and partial least-squares calibration.

Authors:  Norman D Forsberg; Brian W Smith; Greg J Sower; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 9.028

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.