Literature DB >> 12487291

Comparative risk analysis of six volatile organic compounds in California drinking water.

Pamela Williams1, Laurie Benton, John Warmerdam, Patrick Sheehans.   

Abstract

The widespread use and storage of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the United States has led to releases of these chemicals into the environment, including groundwater sources of drinking water. Many of these VOCs are commonly found in public drinking water supplies across the nation and are considered by state or federal agencies to be potentially carcinogenic to humans. In this paper, we evaluate the detection frequencies, detected concentrations, and relative cancer risks of six VOCs in drinking water sources in California from 1995 to 2001. We find that during this 7-year period, the most frequently detected VOCs in sampled drinking water sources were chloroform (12-14%), PCE (11-13%), and TCE (10-12%). Detection frequencies in water were lower for 1,1-DCE (3-6%), MTBE (1-3%), and benzene (<1%). Mean detected concentrations were also consistently above California's primary maximum contaminant level for some VOCs, including benzene, PCE, and TCE. Although none of the six VOCs necessarily poses a significant public health threat from drinking water exposures, 1,1-DCE and benzene werefound to pose the greatest cancer risk relative to the other VOCs. However, after adjusting for the occurrence of each VOC in drinking water, chloroform and PCE were found to pose the greatest relative cancer risk. Despite media reports about significant MTBE contamination of drinking watersupplies in California, MTBE detections were infrequent and this chemical was found to pose the least cancer risk relative to the other VOCs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12487291     DOI: 10.1021/es020725y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  7 in total

1.  Exposure Cessation During Adulthood Did Not Prevent Immunotoxicity Caused by Developmental Exposure to Low-Level Trichloroethylene in Drinking Water.

Authors:  Kathleen M Gilbert; Shasha Bai; Dustyn Barnette; Sarah J Blossom
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Enhanced Fenton-like degradation of TCE in sand suspensions with magnetite by NTA/EDTA at circumneutral pH.

Authors:  Na Wang; Daqing Jia; Yaoyao Jin; Sheng-Peng Sun; Qiang Ke
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Opposing Actions of Developmental Trichloroethylene and High-Fat Diet Coexposure on Markers of Lipogenesis and Inflammation in Autoimmune-Prone Mice.

Authors:  Sarah J Blossom; Lorenzo Fernandes; Shasha Bai; Sangeeta Khare; Kuppan Gokulan; Youzhong Yuan; Michael Dewall; Frank A Simmen; Kathleen M Gilbert
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Risk assessment of trihalomethanes from tap water in Fortaleza, Brazil.

Authors:  Rommel B Viana; Rivelino M Cavalcante; Fuad M G Braga; Anderson B Viana; José C de Araujo; Ronaldo F Nascimento; André S Pimentel
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 5.  Human Health Risk Assessment Applied to Rural Populations Dependent on Unregulated Drinking Water Sources: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Lorelei Ford; Lalita Bharadwaj; Lianne McLeod; Cheryl Waldner
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Toward the Required Detection Limits for Volatile Organic Constituents in Marine Environments with Infrared Evanescent Field Chemical Sensors.

Authors:  Carina Dettenrieder; Yosef Raichlin; Abraham Katzir; Boris Mizaikoff
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Risk assessment of exposure to lead in tap water among residents of Seri Kembangan, Selangor state, Malaysia.

Authors:  C S Lim; M S Shaharuddin; W Y Sam
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2012-11-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.