Literature DB >> 12486779

The effect of local exhaust ventilation controls on dust exposures during concrete cutting and grinding activities.

Gerry A Croteau1, Steven E Guffey, Mary Ellen Flanagan, Noah S Seixas.   

Abstract

This study assessed the effectiveness of commercially available local exhaust ventilation (LEV) systems for controlling respirable dust and crystalline silica exposures during concrete cutting and grinding activities. Work activities were performed by union-sponsored apprentices and included tuck-point grinding, surface grinding, paver block and brick cutting (masonry saw), and concrete block cutting (hand-held saw). In a randomized block design, implemented under controlled field conditions, three ventilation rates (0, 30, and 75 cfm) were tested for each tool. Each ventilation treatment was replicated three times in random order for a total of nine 15-min work sessions per study subject. With the exception of the hand-held saw, the use of LEV resulted in a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in respirable dust exposure. Mean exposure levels for the 75 cfm treatments were less than that of the 30 cfm treatments; however, differences between these two treatments were only significant for paver block cutting (p < 0.01). Although exposure reduction was significant (70-90% at the low ventilation rate and 80-95% reduction at the high ventilation rate), personal respirable dust [corrected] exposures remained very high: 1.4-2.8 x PEL (permissible exposure limit) at the low ventilation rate and 0.9-1.7 x PEL at the high ventilation rate. Exposure levels found under actual field conditions would likely be lower due to the intermittent nature of most job tasks. Despite incomplete control LEV has merit, as it would reduce the risk of workers developing disease, allow workers to use a lower level of respiratory protection, protect workers during short duration work episodes reduce exposure to nearby workers, and reduce clean-up associated dust exposures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12486779     DOI: 10.1080/15428110208984734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIHA J (Fairfax, Va)        ISSN: 1542-8117


  5 in total

1.  Engineering control technologies to reduce occupational silica exposures in masonry cutting and tuckpointing.

Authors:  John D Meeker; Michael R Cooper; Daniel Lefkowitz; Pam Susi
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Review of qualitative approaches for the construction industry: designing a risk management toolbox.

Authors:  David M Zalk; Ton Spee; Matt Gillen; Thomas J Lentz; Andrew Garrod; Paul Evans; Paul Swuste
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2011-06-30

3.  A case-control study of airways obstruction among construction workers.

Authors:  John Dement; Laura Welch; Knut Ringen; Patricia Quinn; Anna Chen; Scott Haas
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Experimental Evaluation of Respirable Dust and Crystalline Silica Controls During Simulated Performance of Stone Countertop Fabrication Tasks With Powered Hand Tools.

Authors:  David L Johnson; Margaret L Phillips; Chaolong Qi; Anthony T Van; Danielle A Hawley
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 2.179

5.  Field Evaluation of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators on Construction Jobsites for Protection against Airborne Ultrafine Particles.

Authors:  Atin Adhikari; Aniruddha Mitra; Abbas Rashidi; Imaobong Ekpo; Jacob Schwartz; Jefferson Doehling
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.