Literature DB >> 12486650

Remifentanil-clonidine-propofol versus sufentanil-propofol anesthesia for coronary artery bypass surgery.

K Gerlach1, Th Uhlig, M Hüppe, E Kraatz, L Saager, A Schmitz, V Dörges, P Schmucker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare a remifentanil-clonidine-propofol regimen with conventional sufentanil-propofol anesthesia.
DESIGN: Randomized, nonblinded trial.
SETTING: A single university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Male patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.
INTERVENTIONS: In the control group, anesthesia was induced with 0.5 microg/kg of sufentanil and 0.2 to 0.3 mg/kg of etomidate after preoxygenation. Propofol (50 to 100 microg/kg/min) and sufentanil (0.5 to 1.0 microg/kg/h) were started after endotracheal intubation. Sufentanil was stopped after aortic decannulation. In the remifentanil-clonidine group, anesthesia was started with remifentanil (0.15 to 0.3 microg/kg/min), followed by etomidate (0.2 to 0.3 mg/kg). Propofol was started at 50 to 100 microg/kg/min, and after endotracheal intubation, clonidine infusion was started (6 to 20 microg/h). Patients received piritramide (0.15 mg/kg) and metamizole (20 mg/kg) for transitional analgesia. In both groups, propofol infusion was reduced to 30 to 60 microg/kg/min at skin closure and stopped when assisted spontaneous breathing led to adequate gas exchange.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The main outcomes were recovery times; somatic variables; plasma catecholamine levels; and self-recorded pain, nausea, and vomiting. Patients in the remifentanil-clonidine group were extubated earlier and had lower plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine levels. After transitional analgesia, the remifentanil-clonidine patients had similar postoperative analgesic use and self-reported pain and side-effect scores.
CONCLUSION: Compared with a sufentanil-propofol regimen, an anesthetic regimen for CABG surgery that combines remifentanil, clonidine, and propofol provides similar hemodynamics. The remifentanil-clonidine regimen reduces catecholamine levels and hastens recovery from anesthesia. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12486650     DOI: 10.1053/jcan.2002.128415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth        ISSN: 1053-0770            Impact factor:   2.628


  5 in total

Review 1.  Fast-track cardiac care for adult cardiac surgical patients.

Authors:  Wai-Tat Wong; Veronica Kw Lai; Yee Eot Chee; Anna Lee
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-09-12

Review 2.  Could remifentanil reduce duration of mechanical ventilation in comparison with other opioids for mechanically ventilated patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yibing Zhu; Yinhua Wang; Bin Du; Xiuming Xi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 9.097

3.  Effects of Remifentanil and Sufentanil Anesthesia on Cardiac Function and Serological Parameters in Congenital Heart Surgery.

Authors:  Zhigang Qin; Younian Xu
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 2.682

4.  Protective Effect of Sufentanil on Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Rats by Inhibiting Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress.

Authors:  Liuji Qiu; Guochen Zhong; Zhiqi Hou; Jiayin Lin; Laibao Sun
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 2.238

5.  Remifentanil use in pediatric scoliosis surgery-an effective alternative to morphine (a retrospective study).

Authors:  Ibrahim Abu-Kishk; Roei Hod-Feins; Yoram Anekstein; Yigal Mirovsky; Josi Barr; Eli Lahat; Gideon Eshel
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.759

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.