Literature DB >> 12486342

One versus two BAK fusion cages in posterior lumbar interbody fusion to L4-L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis: a randomized, controlled prospective study in 25 patients with minimum two-year follow-up.

Jie Zhao1, Xinwei Wang, Tiesheng Hou, Shisheng He.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: We accomplish posterior lumbar interbody fusion using posterolateral insertion of a single BAK fusion cage (Sulzer Spine-Tech, Minneapolis, MN) with unilateral facetectomy and hemilaminectomy.
OBJECTIVE: To subject a single BAK fusion cage inserted posterolaterally in posterior lumbar interbody fusion to a randomized, controlled trial to assess its clinical safety and efficacy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Routinely, two threaded cages in posterior lumbar interbody fusion have been recommended, which need bilateral facetectomy, extensive exposure, and retraction of cauda equina. Our biomechanical study showed that it is feasible to accomplish posterior lumbar interbody fusion using posterolateral insertion of a single threaded cage with unilateral facetectomy and hemilaminectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with a primary diagnosis of L4-L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis accompanied by low back pain and unilateral leg pain, having failed conservative treatment, were considered for the procedure. Twenty-five patients were randomized into two groups of 13 and 12, respectively, using a random number table. Group 1 had a single BAK fusion cage inserted posterolaterally and oriented counter anterolaterally on the symptomatic side with unilateral facetectomy and hemilaminectomy. Group 2 had two BAK fusion cages inserted posteriorly with bilateral facetectomy and laminectomy.
RESULTS: A total of 12 of 13 patients in Group 1 and 11 of 12 patients in Group 2 achieved successful radiographic arthrodesis. Clinical results at 2 years for 7 of 13 patients in Group 1 were excellent, 4 of 13 were good, 2 of 13 fair, and no poor clinical results; 4 of 12 patients in Group 2 were excellent, 5 of 12 good, 1 of 12 fair, and 2 of 12 poor. Regarding complications, 2 of 12 in Group 2 had a postoperative motor and sensory deficit of the opposite adjacent (upper) nerve root.
CONCLUSION: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using diagonal insertion of a single threaded cage by a posterior approach with unilateral facetectomy enables sufficient decompression and solid interbody arthrodesis to be achieved while maintaining a majority of the posterior elements. It is a clinically safe, easy, and economic technique to treat lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12486342     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200212150-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  11 in total

1.  Long-term effects of placing one or two cages in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Mingzheng Zhang; Fang Pu; Liqiang Xu; Linlin Zhang; Jie Yao; Deyu Li; Yu Wang; Yubo Fan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  An 11-year minimum follow-up of the Charite III lumbar disc replacement for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Shi-bao Lu; Yong Hai; Chao Kong; Qing-yi Wang; Qingjun Su; Lei Zang; Nan Kang; Xiang-long Meng; Yu Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using an unilateral cage: a prospective study of clinical outcome and stability.

Authors:  Seok Ki Lee; Seok Won Kim; Chang Il Ju; Sung Myung Lee; Myung Hoon Kim
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2014-06-30

Review 4.  Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis.

Authors:  J N A Gibson; G Waddell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-10-19

5.  Posterolateral versus circumferential instrumented fusion for monosegmental lumbar degenerative disc disease using an expandable cage.

Authors:  Panagiotis Korovessis; Thomas Repantis; Andreas Baikousis; Panagiotis Iliopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2011-10-21

6.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion via a unilateral approach.

Authors:  Hyun Chul Shin; Seong Yi; Keung Nyun Kim; Sang Hyun Kim; Do Heum Yoon
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 2.759

7.  Modified posterior lumbar interbody fusion using a single cage with unilateral pedicle screws: a retrospective clinical study.

Authors:  Chen Bingqian; Xue Feng; Shen Xiaowen; Zhang Feng; Fang Xiaowen; Qian Yufeng; Dong Qirong
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 8.  The VariLift(®) Interbody Fusion System: expandable, standalone interbody fusion.

Authors:  Erik Emstad; Diana Cardenas Del Monaco; Louis C Fielding; Jon E Block
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2015-05-26

9.  Prospective randomized controlled trial of The Stabilis Stand Alone Cage (SAC) versus Bagby and Kuslich (BAK) implants for anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  William Lavelle; Robert F McLain; Candace Rufo-Smith; David P Gurd
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2014-12-01

10.  Comparison of Clinical and Radiological Results of Posterolateral Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of L4 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Shugo Kuraishi; Jun Takahashi; Keijiro Mukaiyama; Masayuki Shimizu; Shota Ikegami; Toshimasa Futatsugi; Hiroki Hirabayashi; Nobuhide Ogihara; Hiroyuki Hashidate; Yutaka Tateiwa; Hisatoshi Kinoshita; Hiroyuki Kato
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-02-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.