Literature DB >> 12485638

Stroke frequency in front crawl: its mechanical link to the fluid forces required in non-propulsive directions.

Toshimasa Yanai1.   

Abstract

Two hypotheses were tested: (a) stroke frequency is predictable from the amplitudes of bodyroll and the turning effect around the body's long-axis generated by the non-propulsive fluid forces (that is, the torque driving bodyroll), and (b) swimmers exhibit at least one alteration in the factors influencing the bodyroll cycle as they increase the stroke frequency for faster swimming, so that they can reduce the fluid forces "wasted" in non-propulsive directions. The mechanical formula that links stroke frequency and the kinetics of bodyroll was derived on the basis of Euler's equation of motion. Experimental data were collected from competitive swimmers to validate the derived mechanical relations and to examine the strategy that skilled swimmers would use to change the stroke frequency as they swam faster. A strong correlation (slow: r = 0.70 and fast: r = 0.85) and a non-significant difference between the observed stroke frequency and the formula-based estimates supported the first hypothesis. As the subjects increased stroke frequency (38%) for faster swimming, bodyroll decreased (19%) and the trunk twist increased (40%). The combined alterations resulted in a small reduction in the shoulder roll (12%), enabling the swimmers to gain the benefits associated with a large rolling action of the upper trunk, while limiting the amount of increase in the turning effect of fluid forces in non-propulsive directions (40%). The second hypothesis was, therefore, supported. The derived mechanical formula provides a theoretical basis to explore mechanisms underlying the interrelations among stroke frequency, stroke length and swimming speed, and sheds light on a possible reason that swimmers generally adopt six-beat kicks. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12485638     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(02)00299-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  5 in total

1.  Path Linearity of Elite Swimmers in a 400 m Front Crawl Competition.

Authors:  Giorgio Gatta; Matteo Cortesi; Francesco Lucertini; Piero Benelli; Davide Sisti; Silvia Fantozzi
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Differences in kinematics and energy cost between front crawl and backstroke below the anaerobic threshold.

Authors:  Tomohiro Gonjo; Carla McCabe; Ana Sousa; João Ribeiro; Ricardo J Fernandes; João Paulo Vilas-Boas; Ross Sanders
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Body roll amplitude and timing in backstroke swimming and their differences from front crawl at the same swimming intensities.

Authors:  Tomohiro Gonjo; Ricardo J Fernandes; João Paulo Vilas-Boas; Ross Sanders
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Relationship between Stroking Parameters and Leg Movement Quantity in 100 Metre Front Crawl.

Authors:  Andrew D Sortwell
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2011-01-15

5.  The Effect of Breathing Laterality on Hip Roll Kinematics in Submaximal Front Crawl Swimming.

Authors:  John M Barden; Mike V Barber
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.