Literature DB >> 12485628

Human vs machine: evaluation of fluorescence micrographs.

Tim W Nattkemper1, Thorsten Twellmann, Helge Ritter, Walter Schubert.   

Abstract

To enable high-throughput screening of molecular phenotypes, multi-parameter fluorescence microscopy is applied. Object of our study is lymphocytes which invade human tissue. One important basis for our collaborative project is the development of methods for automatic and accurate evaluation of fluorescence micrographs. As a part of this, we focus on the question of how to measure the accuracy of microscope image interpretation, by human experts or a computer system. Following standard practice we use methods motivated by receiver operator characteristics to discuss the accuracies of human experts and of neural network-based algorithms. For images of good quality the algorithms achieve the accuracy of the medium-skilled experts. In images with increased noise, the classifiers are outperformed by some of the experts. Furthermore, the neural network-based cell detection is much faster than the human experts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12485628     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-4825(02)00060-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Biol Med        ISSN: 0010-4825            Impact factor:   4.589


  7 in total

1.  Determining the subcellular location of new proteins from microscope images using local features.

Authors:  Luis Pedro Coelho; Joshua D Kangas; Armaghan W Naik; Elvira Osuna-Highley; Estelle Glory-Afshar; Margaret Fuhrman; Ramanuja Simha; Peter B Berget; Jonathan W Jarvik; Robert F Murphy
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Biological imaging software tools.

Authors:  Kevin W Eliceiri; Michael R Berthold; Ilya G Goldberg; Luis Ibáñez; B S Manjunath; Maryann E Martone; Robert F Murphy; Hanchuan Peng; Anne L Plant; Badrinath Roysam; Nico Stuurman; Nico Stuurmann; Jason R Swedlow; Pavel Tomancak; Anne E Carpenter
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  A biosegmentation benchmark for evaluation of bioimage analysis methods.

Authors:  Elisa Drelie Gelasca; Boguslaw Obara; Dmitry Fedorov; Kristian Kvilekval; Bs Manjunath
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 4.  Advances in toponomics drug discovery: Imaging cycler microscopy correctly predicts a therapy method of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Walter Schubert
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 4.355

5.  A Machine Learning Assisted, Label-free, Non-invasive Approach for Somatic Reprogramming in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Colony Formation Detection and Prediction.

Authors:  Ke Fan; Sheng Zhang; Ying Zhang; Jun Lu; Mike Holcombe; Xiao Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A machine vision system for automated non-invasive assessment of cell viability via dark field microscopy, wavelet feature selection and classification.

Authors:  Ning Wei; Erwin Flaschel; Karl Friehs; Tim Wilhelm Nattkemper
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Fast and simple tool for the quantification of biofilm-embedded cells sub-populations from fluorescent microscopic images.

Authors:  Mikhail I Bogachev; Vladimir Yu Volkov; Oleg A Markelov; Elena Yu Trizna; Diana R Baydamshina; Vladislav Melnikov; Regina R Murtazina; Pavel V Zelenikhin; Irshad S Sharafutdinov; Airat R Kayumov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.