Literature DB >> 12484801

Economic evaluations of varicella vaccination programmes: a review of the literature.

Nancy Thiry1, Philippe Beutels, Pierre Van Damme, Eddy Van Doorslaer.   

Abstract

Chickenpox infections are generally mild but due to their very high incidence among healthy children they give rise to considerable morbidity and occasional mortality. With the development of a varicella vaccine in the early 1970s and its progressive licensing in many countries, interest in the efficiency of varicella immunisation programmes grew. The objective of this review was to discuss the methodological aspects and results of published economic evaluations of varicella vaccination. From this, we attempted to make recommendations. A computerised search was carried out; 17 full economic evaluations of varicella vaccination were retrieved. The review identified the methodological divergences and similarities between the articles in four areas: study design, epidemiological data, economic data and model characteristics. We assessed to what extent the applied methods conform to general guidelines for the economic evaluation of healthcare interventions and compared the studies' results. The desirability of a universal vaccination programme depends on whose perspective is taken. Despite variability in data and model assumptions, the studies suggest that universal vaccination of infants is attractive to society because large savings occur from averted unproductive days for parents. For the healthcare payer, universal vaccination of infants does not generate savings. Vaccination of susceptible adolescents has been proposed by some authors as a viable alternative; the attractiveness of this is highly dependent on the negative predictive value of anamnestic screening. Targeted vaccination of healthcare workers and immunocompromised individuals appears relatively cost effective. Findings for other target groups are either contradictory or provide insufficient evidence for any unequivocal recommendations to be made. High sensitivity to vaccine price was reported in most studies. This review highlights that some aspects of these studies need to be further improved before final recommendations can be made. First, more transparency, completeness and compliance to general methodological guidelines are required. Second, because of the increasing severity of varicella with age, it is preferable and in some cases essential to use dynamic models for the assessment of universal vaccination strategies. Third, most studies focused on the strategy of vaccinating children only while their results depended heavily on disputable assumptions (regarding vaccine effectiveness and impact on herpes zoster). Since violation of these assumptions could have important adverse public health effects, we suggest pre-adolescent vaccination as a more secure alternative. This option deserves more attention in future analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12484801     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200321010-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  65 in total

1.  Inconsistencies in the "societal perspective" on costs of the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.

Authors:  D Meltzer; M Johannesson
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1999 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  A cost benefit analysis of routine varicella vaccination in Spain.

Authors:  J Díez Domingo; M Ridao; J Latour; A Ballester; A Morant
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  1999-03-17       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  The friction cost method for measuring indirect costs of disease.

Authors:  M A Koopmanschap; F F Rutten; B M van Ineveld; L van Roijen
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 4.  An exercise on the feasibility of carrying out secondary economic analyses.

Authors:  T Jefferson; M Mugford; A Gray; V Demicheli
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Varicella vaccination for healthcare workers at a university hospital: an analysis of costs and benefits.

Authors:  A M Tennenberg; J E Brassard; J Van Lieu; L M Drusin
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.254

6.  Controlling varicella in the healthcare setting: the cost effectiveness of using varicella vaccine in healthcare workers.

Authors:  M D Nettleman; M Schmid
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.254

7.  Postlicensure safety surveillance for varicella vaccine.

Authors:  R P Wise; M E Salive; M M Braun; G T Mootrey; J F Seward; L G Rider; P R Krause
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-09-13       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Cost-effectiveness of routine antenatal varicella screening.

Authors:  J C Glantz; A I Mushlin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Susceptibility to varicella zoster virus infection in health care workers.

Authors:  J Gallagher; B Quaid; B Cryan
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.611

10.  Cost-effectiveness of a routine varicella vaccination program for US children.

Authors:  T A Lieu; S L Cochi; S B Black; M E Halloran; H R Shinefield; S J Holmes; M Wharton; A E Washington
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Economic evaluation of varicella vaccination programmes: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Thomas Hammerschmidt; Kurt Banz; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Albrecht Neiss; Peter Wutzler
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Varicella vaccination in England and Wales: cost-utility analysis.

Authors:  M Brisson; W J Edmunds
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Do costs of varicella justify routine infant vaccination? Pharmacoeconomic and clinical considerations.

Authors:  M J Postma; J M Bos; R Welte; R de Groot; W Luytjes; H C Rümke; P Beutels
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2004-02

4.  Deterministic SIR (Susceptible-Infected-Removed) models applied to varicella outbreaks.

Authors:  J Ospina Giraldo; D Hincapié Palacio
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 2.451

Review 5.  Cost-effectiveness analyses of vaccination programmes : a focused review of modelling approaches.

Authors:  Sun-Young Kim; Sue J Goldie
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Reviewing the cost effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination: the importance of uncertainty in the choice of data sources.

Authors:  Joke Bilcke; Philippe Beutels
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Cost-effectiveness of adult vaccinations: A systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew J Leidner; Neil Murthy; Harrell W Chesson; Matthew Biggerstaff; Charles Stoecker; Aaron M Harris; Anna Acosta; Kathleen Dooling; Carolyn B Bridges
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  Childhood varicella-zoster virus vaccination in Belgium: cost-effective only in the long run or without exogenous boosting?

Authors:  Joke Bilcke; Albert Jan van Hoek; Philippe Beutels
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Herpes zoster infection, vaccination and immunocompromised rheumatology patients.

Authors:  Mortimer B O'Connor; Mark J Phelan
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 2.631

10.  Varicella vaccination in Italy : an economic evaluation of different scenarios.

Authors:  Laurent Coudeville; Alain Brunot; Carlo Giaquinto; Carlo Lucioni; Benoit Dervaux
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.