Literature DB >> 12484576

The fourteen-day rule and colorectal cancer.

Stewart Walsh1, Caroline Bruce, Steve Bennington, Srinivasan Ravi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of the fourteen-day rule on the colorectal service of a district general hospital.
METHODS: Prospective audit of all patients referred by general practitioners to the colorectal service of a district general hospital serving a population of approximately 300,000 people. The main outcome measures were: (i) mean interval in days from referral to first clinic appointment; (ii) first clinic appointment to diagnosis; and (iii) overall interval from referral to diagnosis.
RESULTS: There was a change in the referral pattern with greater numbers of 'fourteen-day rule' and urgent referrals than expected (P < 0.001). The mean time interval from referral to diagnosis was reduced (P < 0.01). This was due to a reduction in the wait for a first clinic appointment (P < 0.01). The wait between first appointment and diagnosis was unchanged (P < 0.05). Waiting times for patients referred as 'routine' or whose GPs did not specify a priority also improved.
CONCLUSIONS: The 'fourteen-day rule' with respect to colorectal cancer has reduced waiting times for a first appointment to see a specialist. Further improvements will require additional resources to reduce the delay for investigations. The effect on long-term survival remains to be seen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12484576      PMCID: PMC2504201          DOI: 10.1308/003588402760978166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  7 in total

1.  Referral letters.

Authors:  N K Menon
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Follow-up care in cancer: adjusting for referral targets and extending choice.

Authors:  Kate Wilson; Anne Lydon; Ziv Amir
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Stage, survival and delays in lung, colorectal, prostate and ovarian cancer: comparison between diagnostic routes.

Authors:  Richard D Neal; Victoria L Allgar; Nasreen Ali; Brenda Leese; Phil Heywood; Gill Proctor; Joyce Evans
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Factors Contributing to Delay in Specialist Care After Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis in Kentucky.

Authors:  Zeta Chow; Patrick Osterhaus; Bin Huang; Quan Chen; Nancy Schoenberg; Mark Dignan; B Mark Evers; Avinash Bhakta
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  The Department of Health's "two week standard" for bowel cancer: is it working?

Authors:  K Flashman; D P O'Leary; A Senapati; M R Thompson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  The two-week-wait cancer initiative in urology: useful modernization?

Authors:  Darrell Allen; Rick Popert; Tim O'Brien
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 18.000

Review 7.  The effects of the Two-Week Rule on NHS colorectal cancer diagnostic services: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Kymberley Thorne; Hayley A Hutchings; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.