Literature DB >> 12483757

Estimating the monetary value of health care: lessons from environmental economics.

Nick Hanley1, Mandy Ryan, Robert Wright.   

Abstract

In the recent past, considerable effort in health economics has been made on applying stated preference methods such as contingent valuation and choice experiments. Despite this increased use, there is still considerable scepticism concerning the value of these approaches. The application of contingent valuation in environmental economics has a long history and has been widely accepted. Whilst choice experiments were introduced to the environmental and health economics literature at a similar time, the wider acceptance of monetary measures of benefit in environmental economics has meant that they have also been more widely applied. The purpose of this paper is to identify some of the key issues and debates that have taken place in the environmental economics literature, summarise the state of the art with respect to these issues, and consider how health economists have addressed these issues. Important areas for future research in health economics are identified. Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12483757     DOI: 10.1002/hec.763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  26 in total

1.  Validity and Reliability of Willingness-to-Pay Estimates: Evidence from Two Overlapping Discrete-Choice Experiments.

Authors:  Harry Telser; Karolin Becker; Peter Zweifel
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Willingness-to-pay and demand curves: a comparison of results obtained using different elicitation formats.

Authors:  David K Whynes; Emma J Frew; Jane L Wolstenholme
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2005-12

3.  The link between past informal payments and willingness of the Hungarian population to pay formal fees for health care services: results from a contingent valuation study.

Authors:  Petra Baji; Milena Pavlova; László Gulácsi; Miklós Farkas; Wim Groot
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-08-30

4.  Elicitation of ostomy pouch preferences: a discrete-choice experiment.

Authors:  Ole Bonnichsen
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 5.  A scoping review of intersectoral action for health equity involving governments.

Authors:  Ketan Shankardass; Orielle Solar; Kelly Murphy; Lorraine Greaves; Patricia O'Campo
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.380

6.  Consumer willingness to invest money and time for benefits of lifestyle behaviour change: an application of the contingent valuation method.

Authors:  Adrienne F G Alayli-Goebbels; Job van Exel; André J H A Ament; Nanne K de Vries; Sandra D M Bot; Johan L Severens
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Improving the Validity of Stated-Preference Data in Health Research: The Potential of the Time-to-Think Approach.

Authors:  Semra Ozdemir
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  How does cost matter in health-care discrete-choice experiments?

Authors:  F Reed Johnson; Ateesha F Mohamed; Semra Ozdemir; Deborah A Marshall; Kathryn A Phillips
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  The economic value of an improved malaria treatment programme in Zambia: results from a contingent valuation survey.

Authors:  Felix Masiye; Clas Rehnberg
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.979

10.  Assessing the Value of Treatment to Address Various Symptoms Associated with Multiple Sclerosis: Results from a Contingent Valuation Study.

Authors:  Pei-Jung Lin; Cayla J Saret; Peter J Neumann; Eileen A Sandberg; Joshua T Cohen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.