Literature DB >> 12483678

MOPED: method for optimizing physical energy parameters using decoys.

Chaok Seok1, J B Rosen, John D Chodera, Ken A Dill.   

Abstract

We present a method called MOPED for optimizing energetic and structural parameters in computational models, including all-atom energy functions, when native structures and decoys are given. The present method goes beyond previous approaches in treating energy functions that are nonlinear in the parameters and continuous in the degrees of freedom. We illustrate the method by improving solvation parameters in the energy function EEF1, which consists of the CHARMM19 polar hydrogen force field augmented by a Gaussian solvation term. Although the published parameters for EEF1 correctly discriminate the native from decoys in the decoy sets of Levitt et al., they fail on several of the more difficult decoy sets of Baker et al. MOPED successfully finds improved parameters that allow EEF1 to discriminate native from decoy structures on all protein structures that do not have metals or prosthetic groups. Copyright 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 24: 89-97, 2003

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12483678     DOI: 10.1002/jcc.10124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  9 in total

1.  Decoys for docking.

Authors:  Alan P Graves; Ruth Brenk; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  A composite score for predicting errors in protein structure models.

Authors:  David Eramian; Min-yi Shen; Damien Devos; Francisco Melo; Andrej Sali; Marc A Marti-Renom
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Optimization of the GB/SA solvation model for predicting the structure of surface loops in proteins.

Authors:  Agnieszka Szarecka; Hagai Meirovitch
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2006-02-16       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 4.  Sampling and scoring: a marriage made in heaven.

Authors:  Sandor Vajda; David R Hall; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-08-19

5.  How well can the accuracy of comparative protein structure models be predicted?

Authors:  David Eramian; Narayanan Eswar; Min-Yi Shen; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Use of decoys to optimize an all-atom force field including hydration.

Authors:  Yelena A Arnautova; Harold A Scheraga
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Divergence, recombination and retention of functionality during protein evolution.

Authors:  Yanlong O Xu; Randall W Hall; Richard A Goldstein; David D Pollock
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.639

8.  Identifying native-like protein structures with scoring functions based on all-atom ECEPP force fields, implicit solvent models and structure relaxation.

Authors:  Yelena A Arnautova; Yury N Vorobjev; Jorge A Vila; Harold A Scheraga
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-10

9.  Prediction of hot spot residues at protein-protein interfaces by combining machine learning and energy-based methods.

Authors:  Stefano Lise; Cedric Archambeau; Massimiliano Pontil; David T Jones
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.