OBJECTIVES: The airleak test is measured with a manometer as the pressure necessary to generate an audible airleak around the endotracheal tube. Our objectives were to determine whether the airleak test predicts postextubation stridor in children and if age affects its sensitivity and specificity. DESIGN: A retrospective study. SETTING: Pediatric intensive care unit. PATIENTS: We studied all intubated patients admitted to our pediatric intensive care unit between July 1998 and December 1999. Patients were excluded if they had acute viral croup, tracheal surgery, hypotonic airway, or vocal cord paralysis or if they died before extubation. INTERVENTIONS: Medical records were reviewed for patient demographics, presence of an airleak on the day of extubation, airleak values, presence of postextubation stridor, and extubation failure secondary to upper airway obstruction. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One hundred and five patients met our inclusion criteria and had an airleak test at the time of extubation. In children <7 yrs of age, the incidence of postextubation stridor was similar in patients with or without an airleak at >20 mm Hg (50% vs. 67.7%; >.05) with a sensitivity of 65.6% (95% confidence interval, 46.9-80.8). In children >or=7 yrs of age, the incidence of postextubation stridor was greater in patients with an airleak at >20 mm Hg (55.5% vs. 5.8%; p=.01) with a sensitivity of 83.3% (95% confidence interval, 36.8-99) in predicting postextubation stridor. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the airleak test has a low sensitivity when used as a screening test to predict postextubation stridor in young children (<7 yrs old), whereas in older children (>or=7 yrs old) the airleak test may predict postextubation stridor.
OBJECTIVES: The airleak test is measured with a manometer as the pressure necessary to generate an audible airleak around the endotracheal tube. Our objectives were to determine whether the airleak test predicts postextubation stridor in children and if age affects its sensitivity and specificity. DESIGN: A retrospective study. SETTING: Pediatric intensive care unit. PATIENTS: We studied all intubated patients admitted to our pediatric intensive care unit between July 1998 and December 1999. Patients were excluded if they had acute viral croup, tracheal surgery, hypotonic airway, or vocal cord paralysis or if they died before extubation. INTERVENTIONS: Medical records were reviewed for patient demographics, presence of an airleak on the day of extubation, airleak values, presence of postextubation stridor, and extubation failure secondary to upper airway obstruction. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One hundred and five patients met our inclusion criteria and had an airleak test at the time of extubation. In children <7 yrs of age, the incidence of postextubation stridor was similar in patients with or without an airleak at >20 mm Hg (50% vs. 67.7%; >.05) with a sensitivity of 65.6% (95% confidence interval, 46.9-80.8). In children >or=7 yrs of age, the incidence of postextubation stridor was greater in patients with an airleak at >20 mm Hg (55.5% vs. 5.8%; p=.01) with a sensitivity of 83.3% (95% confidence interval, 36.8-99) in predicting postextubation stridor. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the airleak test has a low sensitivity when used as a screening test to predict postextubation stridor in young children (<7 yrs old), whereas in older children (>or=7 yrs old) the airleak test may predict postextubation stridor.
Authors: Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-10-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-10-18 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Robinder G Khemani; Justin Hotz; Rica Morzov; Rutger Flink; Asavari Kamerkar; Patrick A Ross; Christopher J L Newth Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Robinder G Khemani; Tro Sekayan; Justin Hotz; Rutger C Flink; Gerrard F Rafferty; Narayan Iyer; Christopher J L Newth Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Angela T Wratney; Daniel Kelly Benjamin; Anthony D Slonim; James He; Donna S Hamel; Ira M Cheifetz Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Robinder G Khemani; James B Schneider; Rica Morzov; Barry Markovitz; Christopher J L Newth Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2013-01-18 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: Robinder G Khemani; Justin Hotz; Rica Morzov; Rutger C Flink; Asvari Kamerkar; Marie LaFortune; Gerrard F Rafferty; Patrick A Ross; Christopher J L Newth Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2016-06-18 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Christopher J L Newth; Shekhar Venkataraman; Douglas F Willson; Kathleen L Meert; Rick Harrison; J Michael Dean; Murray Pollack; Jerry Zimmerman; Kanwaljeet J S Anand; Joseph A Carcillo; Carol E Nicholson Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Giriraj K Sharma; Gurpreet S Ahuja; Maximilian Wiedmann; Kathryn E Osann; Erica Su; Andrew E Heidari; Joseph C Jing; Yueqiao Qu; Frances Lazarow; Alex Wang; Lidek Chou; Cherry C Uy; Vijay Dhar; John P Cleary; Nguyen Pham; Kevin Huoh; Zhongping Chen; Brian J-F Wong Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Kelby E Knox; Leonardo Nava-Guerra; Justin C Hotz; Christopher J L Newth; Michael C K Khoo; Robinder G Khemani Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 9.296