OBJECTIVE: To investigate markers that predict modes of death in patients with chronic heart failure. DESIGN: Randomised, double blind, three period, comparative, parallel group study (ATLAS, assessment of treatment with lisinopril and survival). PATIENTS: 3164 patients with mild, moderate, or severe chronic heart failure (New York Heart Association functional class II-IV). INTERVENTIONS: High dose (32.5 or 35 mg) or low dose (2.5 or 5 mg) lisinopril once daily for a median of 46 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, sudden death, and chronic heart failure death related to prognostic factors using competing risks analysis. Mode of death was classified by trialists and by an independent end point committee. RESULTS: Age, male sex, pre-existing ischaemic heart disease, increasing heart rate, creatinine concentration, and certain drugs taken at randomisation were markers of increased risk of all cause mortality and cardiovascular death. There were risk markers for sudden death that were different from the risk markers for death from chronic heart failure. Low systolic blood pressure at baseline, raised creatinine, reduced serum sodium or haemoglobin, and increased heart rate were associated with chronic heart failure death. Use of beta blockers or antiarrhythmic agents (mainly amiodarone) was associated with a reduced risk of sudden death, whereas long acting nitrates and previous use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors were markers for increased risk. CONCLUSIONS: The use of competing risks analysis on the data from the ATLAS study has identified variables associated with certain modes of death in heart failure patients. This approach to analysing outcomes may make it possible to predict which patients might benefit most from particular therapeutic interventions.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To investigate markers that predict modes of death in patients with chronic heart failure. DESIGN: Randomised, double blind, three period, comparative, parallel group study (ATLAS, assessment of treatment with lisinopril and survival). PATIENTS: 3164 patients with mild, moderate, or severe chronic heart failure (New York Heart Association functional class II-IV). INTERVENTIONS: High dose (32.5 or 35 mg) or low dose (2.5 or 5 mg) lisinopril once daily for a median of 46 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, sudden death, and chronic heart failuredeath related to prognostic factors using competing risks analysis. Mode of death was classified by trialists and by an independent end point committee. RESULTS: Age, male sex, pre-existing ischaemic heart disease, increasing heart rate, creatinine concentration, and certain drugs taken at randomisation were markers of increased risk of all cause mortality and cardiovascular death. There were risk markers for sudden death that were different from the risk markers for death from chronic heart failure. Low systolic blood pressure at baseline, raised creatinine, reduced serum sodium or haemoglobin, and increased heart rate were associated with chronic heart failuredeath. Use of beta blockers or antiarrhythmic agents (mainly amiodarone) was associated with a reduced risk of sudden death, whereas long acting nitrates and previous use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors were markers for increased risk. CONCLUSIONS: The use of competing risks analysis on the data from the ATLAS study has identified variables associated with certain modes of death in heart failurepatients. This approach to analysing outcomes may make it possible to predict which patients might benefit most from particular therapeutic interventions.
Authors: B F Uretsky; K Thygesen; P W Armstrong; J G Cleland; J D Horowitz; B M Massie; M Packer; P A Poole-Wilson; L Ryden Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-08-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J G Cleland; P Armstrong; J D Horowitz; B Massie; M Packer; P A Poole-Wilson; L Rydén Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 15.534
Authors: M D Flather; S Yusuf; L Køber; M Pfeffer; A Hall; G Murray; C Torp-Pedersen; S Ball; J Pogue; L Moyé; E Braunwald Journal: Lancet Date: 2000-05-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: M Packer; P A Poole-Wilson; P W Armstrong; J G Cleland; J D Horowitz; B M Massie; L Rydén; K Thygesen; B F Uretsky Journal: Circulation Date: 1999-12-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Douglas S Lee; Philimon Gona; Irene Albano; Martin G Larson; Emelia J Benjamin; Daniel Levy; William B Kannel; Ramachandran S Vasan Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2010-11-11 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Ali Vazir; Brian Claggett; Susan Cheng; Hicham Skali; Amil Shah; David Agulair; Christie Mitchell Ballantyne; Orly Vardeny; Scott D Solomon Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Pasi Tavi; Sampsa Pikkarainen; Jarkko Ronkainen; Perttu Niemelä; Mika Ilves; Matti Weckström; Olli Vuolteenaho; Joseph Bruton; Håkan Westerblad; Heikki Ruskoaho Journal: J Physiol Date: 2003-10-17 Impact factor: 5.182