Literature DB >> 12482156

The coronary heart disease in-patient experience questionnaire (I-PEQ (CHD)): results from the survey of National Health Service patients.

C Jenkinson1, A Coulter, S Bruster, N Richards.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Analysis of data from the National Survey of Coronary Heart Disease patients to develop a core measure of patient experiences of health care. A secondary purpose was to determine whether a single summary index figure could be generated from the instrument.
DESIGN: The data reported here comes from the survey of coronary heart disease (CHD) patients, which was the second in the programme of National Surveys of National Health Service (NHS) patients. It took place during 1999. After an in-patient episode for CHD, questionnaires were mailed out to patients with a covering letter and a pre-paid stamped addressed envelope. Those patients who did not reply within two weeks of the initial mailing were sent a reminder letter and, if this elicited no reply within two weeks, they were sent another copy of the questionnaire. SAMPLE: Of the 116,872 patients who were sent questionnaires, 3399 proved to be ineligible or out-of scope to the survey. Responses were gained from 84,310 (74.3% of eligible respondents).
RESULTS: Reliability analysis supported the existence of seven dimensions which seem to be tapping distinct underlying phenomena: hospital environment, information and communication, patient involvement, coordination of care, discharge and transition, and pain. Higher order factor analysis indicated these dimensions constituted one factor and, consequently, can be summed to create an index figure. The construct validity of the measure was assessed, and it distinguished between groups as was hypothesised.
CONCLUSIONS: The dimensions of the questionnaire have high internal reliability. Both the dimensions of the instrument and the index score were found to have high construct validity. The instrument provides a core set of issues that should be covered when assessing the quality of care for hospital patients with coronary heart disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12482156     DOI: 10.1023/a:1020818500819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  11 in total

1.  The influence of patient sociodemographic characteristics on patient satisfaction.

Authors:  J L Tucker; V A Kelley
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  The relationship between reported problems and patient summary evaluations of hospital care.

Authors:  P D Cleary; S Edgman-Levitan; W McMullen; T L Delbanco
Journal:  QRB Qual Rev Bull       Date:  1992-02

3.  Patients evaluate their hospital care: a national survey.

Authors:  P D Cleary; S Edgman-Levitan; M Roberts; T W Moloney; W McMullen; J D Walker; T L Delbanco
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Health care quality. Incorporating consumer perspectives.

Authors:  P D Cleary; S Edgman-Levitan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-11-19       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Predictors of patient satisfaction.

Authors:  J L Jackson; J Chamberlin; K Kroenke
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Patients' experiences with hospital care in five countries.

Authors:  A Coulter; P D Cleary
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Using patient reports to improve medical care: a preliminary report from 10 hospitals.

Authors:  P D Cleary; S Edgman-Levitan; J D Walker; M Gerteis; T L Delbanco
Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 0.926

8.  Characteristics of practices, general practitioners and patients related to levels of patients' satisfaction with consultations.

Authors:  R Baker
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Patient and hospital characteristics associated with patient assessments of hospital obstetrical care.

Authors:  B S Finkelstein; J Singh; J B Silvers; D Neuhauser; G E Rosenthal
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Problems in the conceptual framework of patient satisfaction research: an empirical exploration.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick; A Hopkins
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  1983-11
View more
  3 in total

1.  A systematic review of the validity and reliability of patient-reported experience measures.

Authors:  Claudia Bull; Joshua Byrnes; Ruvini Hettiarachchi; Martin Downes
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Improvement in Polysomnographic Objective Sleep Quality in Adults with Pectus Excavatum After the Nuss Procedure.

Authors:  Mei-Chen Yang; Chou-Chin Lan; Yao-Kuang Wu; Min-Shiau Hsieh; Bo-Chun Wei; Yeung-Leung Cheng
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Residents' satisfaction with primary medical and health services in Western China.

Authors:  Weinan Dong; Qingyu Zhang; Chunsheng Yan; Wanling Fu; Linlin Xu
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.655

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.