Literature DB >> 12482125

Selection of chemotherapy by ex vivo assessment of tumor sensitivity to cytotoxic drugs: results of a clinical trial.

Ake Berglund1, Bengt Glimelius, Jonas Bergh, Ola Brodin, Marie-Louise Fjällskog, Hans Hagberg, Anne von Heideman, Rolf Larsson, Bengt Tholander, Manuel de la Torre, Gunnar Aström, Kjell Oberg, Gunnar Parö, Peter Nygren.   

Abstract

The feasibility of tumor sampling followed by ex vivo assessment of drug sensitivity, using the short-term fluorometric microculture cytotoxicty assay (FMCA), for selection of chemotherapy was investigated prospectively in patients with advanced cancer not amenable to standard treatment. Taxol (175 mg/m2 every 3 wk) was given to patients with tumor samples being low drug resistant (LDR) to Taxol ex vivo, to patients with no LDR drug, and if other drugs were unsuitable. The remaining patients received the most optimal drug(s) based on the FMCA results. Gastrointestinal cancer was dominating among the 61 eligible patients. Tumor sampling was safely performed in 75% by ultrasound-guided core biopsy. Eighty-two percent of the patients had Taxol. Five patients (8%) had a partial remission and 18 (30%) had stable disease. Tumor response was poorly predicted, probably because the Taxol excipient Cremophor EL is cytotoxic exclusively ex vivo. However, patients with tumor cells being LDR to at least one drug ex vivo lived significantly longer than those with no such drug.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12482125     DOI: 10.1385/MO:19:3:151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  27 in total

1.  Relation of cellular drug resistance to long-term clinical outcome in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Authors:  R Pieters; D R Huismans; A H Loonen; K Hählen; A van der Does-van den Berg; E R van Wering; A J Veerman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-08-17       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Detection of tumor-specific cytotoxic drug activity in vitro using the fluorometric microculture cytotoxicity assay and primary cultures of tumor cells from patients.

Authors:  P Nygren; H Fridborg; K Csoka; C Sundström; M de la Torre; J Kristensen; J Bergh; H Hagberg; B Glimelius; J Rastad
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1994-03-01       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Tailored fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide compared with marrow-supported high-dose chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for high-risk breast cancer: a randomised trial. Scandinavian Breast Group 9401 study.

Authors:  J Bergh; T Wiklund; B Erikstein; E Lidbrink; H Lindman; P Malmström; P Kellokumpu-Lehtinen; N O Bengtsson; G Söderlund; G Anker; E Wist; S Ottosson; E Salminen; P Ljungman; H Holte; J Nilsson; C Blomqvist; N Wilking
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-10-21       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Review of the efficacy of individualized chemotherapy selected by in vitro drug sensitivity testing for patients with cancer.

Authors:  P Cortazar; B E Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Correlation of drug response with the ATP tumorchemosensitivity assay in primary FIGO stage III ovarian cancer.

Authors:  G Konecny; C Crohns; M Pegram; M Felber; S Lude; C Kurbacher; I A Cree; H Hepp; M Untch
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 6.  College of American Pathologists Conference XXXV: solid tumor prognostic factors-which, how and so what? Summary document and recommendations for implementation. Cancer Committee and Conference Participants.

Authors:  M E Hammond; P L Fitzgibbons; C C Compton; D J Grignon; D L Page; L P Fielding; D Bostwick; T F Pajak
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.534

7.  Relationship between pharmacokinetic parameters in patients and cytotoxicity in vitro of standard and investigational anticancer drugs.

Authors:  H Fridborg; P Nygren; R Larsson
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.248

8.  Phase I trial of cremophor EL with bolus doxorubicin.

Authors:  M J Millward; L K Webster; D Rischin; K H Stokes; G C Toner; J F Bishop; I N Olver; B M Linahan; M E Linsenmeyer; D M Woodcock
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 9.  Dose calculation of anticancer drugs: a review of the current practice and introduction of an alternative.

Authors:  H Gurney
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  The polyoxyethylene castor oil Cremophor EL modifies multidrug resistance.

Authors:  G J Schuurhuis; H J Broxterman; H M Pinedo; T H van Heijningen; C K van Kalken; J B Vermorken; E C Spoelstra; J Lankelma
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  A novel in vitro model of human mesothelioma for studying tumor biology and apoptotic resistance.

Authors:  Ki-Up Kim; Shannon M Wilson; Keith S Abayasiriwardana; Rodney Collins; Lars Fjellbirkeland; Zhidong Xu; David M Jablons; Stephen L Nishimura; V Courtney Broaddus
Journal:  Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 6.914

2.  Control of 3-dimensional collagen matrix polymerization for reproducible human mammary fibroblast cell culture in microfluidic devices.

Authors:  Kyung Eun Sung; Gui Su; Carolyn Pehlke; Steven M Trier; Kevin W Eliceiri; Patricia J Keely; Andreas Friedl; David J Beebe
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Novel Phenotypic Fluorescent Three-Dimensional Co-Culture Platforms for Recapitulating Tumor in vivo Progression and for Personalized Therapy.

Authors:  Changge Fang; Yan-Gao Man; Frank Cuttitta; William Stetler-Stevenson; David Salomon; Andrew Mazar; Piotr Kulesza; Steve Rosen; Itzhak Avital; Alexander Stojadinovic; Anahid Jewett; Bin Jiang; James Mulshine
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 4.207

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.