H C Cheng1. 1. Safety Pharmacology, Drug Safety Evaluation, Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bridgewater, NJ 08807, USA. hsien.cheng@aventis.com
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The Cheng-Prusoff equation (1973) is often applied to the determination of equilibrium dissociation constant (KB) of a competitive antagonist when the IC50 value is available. The purpose of this study is to illustrate that the slope function (K) of an agonist concentration-response curve is critical to the determination of KB values. METHODS: The article describes new equations, which incorporate the slope function, consequently yielding more accurate estimation of KB values for antagonists, and tests them using simulated data. The value of KB was calculated according to the following new power equation: KB = IC50/(l + A(K)/Kp) = IC50/[l + (A/EC50)(K)], where IC50 is the concentration of the antagonist producing 50% inhibition, A is the concentration of the agonist against which the IC50 is being determined and KP is the apparent equilibrium dissociation constant of the agonist. RESULTS: The new equation is the same as the Cheng-Prusoff equation when the slope function K is exactly unity. Application of the equation avoids errors inherent in the use of the Cheng-Prusoff equation when the slope function of the agonist concentration-response curve deviates from unity. The new equation was applicable to slope functions less than, equal to or greater than unity. All inhibition curves have a negative slope function of 1, indicating that there is only one single receptor population even though different slope functions of agonist concentration-response curves are involved. The importance of the power function in the Schild plot is illustrated by using the equation: log (x(K) - 1) = log B - log KB, where x is the concentration ratio and B is the concentration of the antagonist. DISCUSSION: This investigation illustrates the application of six power equations for accurate estimation of KB values covering situations with different slope functions of the agonist concentration-response curves.
INTRODUCTION: The Cheng-Prusoff equation (1973) is often applied to the determination of equilibrium dissociation constant (KB) of a competitive antagonist when the IC50 value is available. The purpose of this study is to illustrate that the slope function (K) of an agonist concentration-response curve is critical to the determination of KB values. METHODS: The article describes new equations, which incorporate the slope function, consequently yielding more accurate estimation of KB values for antagonists, and tests them using simulated data. The value of KB was calculated according to the following new power equation: KB = IC50/(l + A(K)/Kp) = IC50/[l + (A/EC50)(K)], where IC50 is the concentration of the antagonist producing 50% inhibition, A is the concentration of the agonist against which the IC50 is being determined and KP is the apparent equilibrium dissociation constant of the agonist. RESULTS: The new equation is the same as the Cheng-Prusoff equation when the slope function K is exactly unity. Application of the equation avoids errors inherent in the use of the Cheng-Prusoff equation when the slope function of the agonist concentration-response curve deviates from unity. The new equation was applicable to slope functions less than, equal to or greater than unity. All inhibition curves have a negative slope function of 1, indicating that there is only one single receptor population even though different slope functions of agonist concentration-response curves are involved. The importance of the power function in the Schild plot is illustrated by using the equation: log (x(K) - 1) = log B - log KB, where x is the concentration ratio and B is the concentration of the antagonist. DISCUSSION: This investigation illustrates the application of six power equations for accurate estimation of KB values covering situations with different slope functions of the agonist concentration-response curves.
Authors: Ying Chen; Mrudula Pullambhatla; Catherine A Foss; Youngjoo Byun; Sridhar Nimmagadda; Srinivasan Senthamizhchelvan; George Sgouros; Ronnie C Mease; Martin G Pomper Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-10-31 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Lisa K Brents; Anna Gallus-Zawada; Anna Radominska-Pandya; Tamara Vasiljevik; Thomas E Prisinzano; William E Fantegrossi; Jeffery H Moran; Paul L Prather Journal: Biochem Pharmacol Date: 2012-01-18 Impact factor: 5.858
Authors: Ying Chen; Catherine A Foss; Youngjoo Byun; Sridhar Nimmagadda; Mrudula Pullambhatla; James J Fox; Mark Castanares; Shawn E Lupold; John W Babich; Ronnie C Mease; Martin G Pomper Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2008-12-25 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Denise Garcia; Patrick Nasarre; Ingrid V Bonilla; Eleanor Hilliard; Yuri K Peterson; Laura Spruill; Anne-Marie Broome; Elizabeth G Hill; Jason T Yustein; Shikhar Mehrotra; Nancy Klauber-DeMore Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2019-09-12 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Bennett Ma; Bin Luo; Danielle H Euler; Tara E Cusick; Gregg Wesolowski; Helmut Glantschnig; Le T Duong; Yangsi Ou; Steven S Carroll; Laura S Lubbers Journal: Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol Date: 2017-02-20 Impact factor: 3.000
Authors: Yi Zheng; Samuel Obeng; Huiqun Wang; David L Stevens; Essie Komla; Dana E Selley; William L Dewey; Hamid I Akbarali; Yan Zhang Journal: ACS Chem Neurosci Date: 2018-07-23 Impact factor: 4.418