Literature DB >> 12481294

What cardiovascular defect does my prenatal mouse mutant have, and why?

Simon J Conway1, Agnieszka Kruzynska-Frejtag, Paige L Kneer, Michal Machnicki, Srinagesh V Koushik.   

Abstract

Since the advent of mouse targeted mutations, gene traps, an escalating use of a variety of complex transgenic manipulations, and large-scale chemical mutagenesis projects yielding many mutants with cardiovascular defects, it has become increasingly evident that defects within the heart and vascular system are largely responsible for the observed in utero lethality of the embryo and early fetus. If a transgenically altered embryo survives implantation but fails to be born, it usually indicates that there is some form of lethal cardiovascular defect present. A number of embryonic organ and body systems, including the central nervous system, gut, lungs, urogenital system, and musculoskeletal system appear to have little or no survival value in utero (Copp, 1995). Cardiovascular abnormalities include the failure to establish an adequate yolk-sac vascular circulation, which results in early lethality (E8.5-10.5); poor cardiac function (E9.0-birth); failure to undergo correct looping and chamber formation of the primitive heart tube (E9.0-11.0); improper septation, including division of the common ventricle and atria and the establishment of a divided outflow tract (E11.0-13.0); inadequate establishment of the cardiac conduction system (E12.0-birth); and the failure of the in utero cardiovascular system to adapt to adult life (birth) and close the interatrial and aorta-pulmonary trunk shunts that are required for normal fetal life. Importantly, the developmental timing of lethality is usually a good indicator of both the type of the cardiovascular defect present and may also suggest the possible underlying cause/s. The purpose of this review is both to review the literature and to provide a beginner's guide for analysing cardiovascular defects in mouse mutants. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12481294     DOI: 10.1002/gene.10152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genesis        ISSN: 1526-954X            Impact factor:   2.487


  79 in total

1.  Trigenic neural crest-restricted Smad7 over-expression results in congenital craniofacial and cardiovascular defects.

Authors:  Sunyong Tang; Paige Snider; Antony B Firulli; Simon J Conway
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 3.582

2.  SWI/SNF complexes containing Brahma or Brahma-related gene 1 play distinct roles in smooth muscle development.

Authors:  Min Zhang; Meng Chen; Ju-Ryoung Kim; Jiliang Zhou; Rebekah E Jones; Johnathan D Tune; Ghassan S Kassab; Daniel Metzger; Shawn Ahlfeld; Simon J Conway; B Paul Herring
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 3.  Combinatorial transcriptional interaction within the cardiac neural crest: a pair of HANDs in heart formation.

Authors:  Anthony B Firulli; Simon J Conway
Journal:  Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today       Date:  2004-06

Review 4.  Cardiac-specific inducible and conditional gene targeting in mice.

Authors:  Thomas Doetschman; Mohamad Azhar
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  The trafficking protein Tmed2/p24beta(1) is required for morphogenesis of the mouse embryo and placenta.

Authors:  Loydie A Jerome-Majewska; Tala Achkar; Li Luo; Floria Lupu; Elizabeth Lacy
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 3.582

6.  Gene trap disruption of the mouse heparan sulfate 6-O-endosulfatase gene, Sulf2.

Authors:  David H Lum; Jenille Tan; Steven D Rosen; Zena Werb
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Smad signaling in the neural crest regulates cardiac outflow tract remodeling through cell autonomous and non-cell autonomous effects.

Authors:  Qunshan Jia; Bradley W McDill; Song-Zhe Li; Chuxia Deng; Ching-Pin Chang; Feng Chen
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 3.582

8.  Lineage-specific responses to reduced embryonic Pax3 expression levels.

Authors:  Hong-Ming Zhou; Jian Wang; Rhonda Rogers; Simon J Conway
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2007-12-27       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 9.  GRK mythology: G-protein receptor kinases in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Gerald W Dorn
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  Gene targeting reveals a widespread role for the high-mobility-group transcription factor Sox11 in tissue remodeling.

Authors:  Elisabeth Sock; Stefanie D Rettig; Janna Enderich; Michael R Bösl; Ernst R Tamm; Michael Wegner
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.