Literature DB >> 1248121

Evaluation of a dipstick test for glucose in urine.

J Dyerberg, L Pedersen, O Aagaard.   

Abstract

As an example of qualitative tests, a dipstick analysis for glucose in urine has been tested for the influence of modifying factors on the test result. Two different types of dipsticks were examined, "Clinistix" and "S-Gluko-test." Used according to manufacturer's instructions, the latter is more sensitive and selective. By multivariance analysis the following variables were examined: urine samples, inter- and intra-analyst, exposure to light, and dipstick batch. The first three contributed significantly to the total variation in results, inter-specimen variation being the most important. With knowledge of the frequency of testing urines with a given glucose concentration and the probability of the result at that concentration, an expression of the probability of the glucose content of a urine sample can be obtained. Even with the tests of the type examined having a sensitivity and specificity exceeding 95%, 14 of 100 patients suspected of having diabetes mellitus on the basis of a dipstick examination will be found to have a urinary glucose concentration of less than 2 mmol/liter. These figures were found when the prevalence of urines with a glucose concentration exceeding 2 mmol/liter was 17.5%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 1248121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  2 in total

Review 1.  Prevalence of diabetes in Zimbabwe: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mutsa Mutowo; Usha Gowda; John Chamunorwa Mangwiro; Paula Lorgelly; Alice Owen; Andre Renzaho
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of self-administered urine glucose test strips as a diabetes screening tool in a low-resource setting in Cambodia.

Authors:  Helen L Storey; Maurits H van Pelt; Socheath Bun; Frances Daily; Tina Neogi; Matthew Thompson; Helen McGuire; Bernhard H Weigl
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.