Literature DB >> 12480075

Central versus peripheral visual field stimulation results in timing differences in dorsal stream sources as measured with MEG.

Julia M Stephen1, Cheryl J Aine, Robert F Christner, Doug Ranken, Mingxiong Huang, Elaine Best.   

Abstract

Small, achromatic circular sinusoids were presented in the central and peripheral visual fields to investigate dorsal visual stream activation. It was hypothesized that peripheral stimulation would lead to faster onset latencies, as well as preferentially activate dorsal stream visual areas relative to central field stimulation. Although both central and peripheral stimulation activated similar areas, the onset latencies of neuromagnetic sources in two dorsal stream areas were found to be significantly shorter for peripheral versus central field stimulation. The results suggest that information from central versus peripheral fields arrives in the higher-order visual areas via different routes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12480075     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00415-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  19 in total

1.  Kafka, paranoic doubles and the brain: hypnagogic vs. hyper-reflexive models of disrupted self in neuropsychiatric disorders and anomalous conscious states.

Authors:  Aaron L Mishara
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 2.464

2.  Losing sight of the bigger picture: peripheral field loss compresses representations of space.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; John C Hicks; Lei Hao; Kathleen A Turano
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Amplitude by Peak Interaction but No Evidence of Auditory Mismatch Response Deficits to Frequency Change in Preschool-Aged Children with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders.

Authors:  Danielle M Kabella; Lucinda Flynn; Amanda Peters; Piyadasa Kodituwakku; Julia M Stephen
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  Psychosis subgroups differ in intrinsic neural activity but not task-specific processing.

Authors:  Matthew E Hudgens-Haney; Lauren E Ethridge; Jennifer E McDowell; Sarah K Keedy; Godfrey D Pearlson; Carol A Tamminga; Matcheri S Keshavan; John A Sweeney; Brett A Clementz
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  MEG source imaging method using fast L1 minimum-norm and its applications to signals with brain noise and human resting-state source amplitude images.

Authors:  Ming-Xiong Huang; Charles W Huang; Ashley Robb; AnneMarie Angeles; Sharon L Nichols; Dewleen G Baker; Tao Song; Deborah L Harrington; Rebecca J Theilmann; Ramesh Srinivasan; David Heister; Mithun Diwakar; Jose M Canive; J Christopher Edgar; Yu-Han Chen; Zhengwei Ji; Max Shen; Fady El-Gabalawy; Michael Levy; Robert McLay; Jennifer Webb-Murphy; Thomas T Liu; Angela Drake; Roland R Lee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Delays in auditory processing identified in preschool children with FASD.

Authors:  Julia M Stephen; Piyadasa W Kodituwakku; Elizabeth L Kodituwakku; Lucinda Romero; Amanda M Peters; Nirupama M Sharadamma; Arvind Caprihan; Brian A Coffman
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.455

7.  Brief report: preliminary evidence of reduced sensitivity in the peripheral visual field of adolescents with autistic spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Elizabeth Milne; Alison Scope; Helen Griffiths; Charlotte Codina; David Buckley
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2013-08

8.  Facilitating neuronal connectivity analysis of evoked responses by exposing local activity with principal component analysis preprocessing: simulation of evoked MEG.

Authors:  Lin Gao; Tongsheng Zhang; Jue Wang; Julia Stephen
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Transient pupillary light reflex in CEP290- or NPHP5-associated Leber congenital amaurosis: Latency as a potential outcome measure of cone function.

Authors:  Arun K Krishnan; Samuel G Jacobson; Alejandro J Roman; Bhavya S Iyer; Alexandra V Garafalo; Elise Héon; Artur V Cideciyan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Effects of acute peripheral/central visual field loss on standing balance.

Authors:  Caitlin O'Connell; Arash Mahboobin; Scott Drexler; Mark S Redfern; Subashan Perera; Amy C Nau; Rakié Cham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.