Literature DB >> 12480069

Differential effect of a distractor on primary saccades and perceptual localization.

T Eggert1, U Sailer, J Ditterich, A Straube.   

Abstract

A distractor presented nearby the target of a goal-directed short latency saccade leads to spatial averaging, that is, the saccade lands between the target and the distractor. This so-called global effect is a characteristic feature of the spatial processing underlying the programming of saccadic eye movements. To determine whether this effect of near distractors on saccade metrics is also reflected in perceptual localization, subjects performed a saccade task and a perceptual localization task using identical, briefly flashed visual stimuli. To make the available visual processing time for saccades and perception more similar, we followed the target with a mask. Without the mask, primary saccades with short latency landed between target and distractor. The distractor had less effect on primary saccades with longer latencies (>200 ms) and did not affect the final eye position after late secondary saccades in the dark. This indicates that the oculomotor system can correctly use information about the target location 200 ms after the target flash even if no visual stimulus is present during this period. Likewise the presence of a distractor did not affect perceptual localization. Under the masking condition a similar global effect occurred for primary saccades with short latencies, but the latency dependence of the global effect was weakened. Secondary saccades and perceptual localization still did not show a global effect. The results suggest that the primary saccade is based on a specific target acquisition process that differs from that used for spatial perception and for the programming of memory-guided corrective saccades.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12480069     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00392-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  10 in total

1.  Preparation and execution of saccades: the problem of limited capacity of computational resources.

Authors:  Uwe J Ilg; Yu Jin; Stefan Schumann; Urs Schwarz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Mislocalization of perceived saccade target position induced by perisaccadic visual stimulation.

Authors:  Holger Awater; Markus Lappe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Automatic and intentional influences on saccade landing.

Authors:  David Aagten-Murphy; Paul M Bays
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Trial history biases the spatial programming of antisaccades.

Authors:  Tara Rastgardani; Victor Lau; Jason J S Barton; Mathias Abegg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The global effect for antisaccades.

Authors:  Jayalakshmi Viswanathan; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The temporal dynamics of the distractor in the global effect.

Authors:  Woo Young Choi; Jayalakshmi Viswanathan; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Acting without seeing: eye movements reveal visual processing without awareness.

Authors:  Miriam Spering; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 13.837

8.  Oculomotor responses and visuospatial perceptual judgments compete for common limited resources.

Authors:  Marc S Tibber; Simon Grant; Michael J Morgan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Perceptual judgment and saccadic behavior in a spatial distortion with briefly presented stimuli.

Authors:  Sonja Stork; Jochen Müsseler; A H C van der Heijden
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-02-11

10.  Individual differences in responsivity to social rewards: Insights from two eye-tracking tasks.

Authors:  Bhismadev Chakrabarti; Anthony Haffey; Loredana Canzano; Christopher P Taylor; Eugene McSorley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.