Literature DB >> 12479723

The influence of reconstructive modality on cost of care in head and neck oncologic surgery.

Guy J Petruzzelli1, John M Brockenbrough, Darl Vandevender, Steven D Creech.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the differential costs of 3 reconstructive modalities in patients undergoing head and neck oncologic surgery.
DESIGN: Cost-identification analysis.
SETTING: Academic tertiary care medical center.
METHODS: Retrospective review of 104 major head and neck resections involving primary tumors of the upper aerodigestive tract requiring a tracheotomy (primary hospital discharge, diagnosis related group 482 from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification) from July 2, 1999, through June 30, 2000. Patients were stratified by reconstruction modality: (1) microvascular free tissue transfer (MFFT), (2) pedicle myocutaneous flaps (PMF), and (3) primary reconstruction and/or skin graft (PR). Dependent variables included length of hospitalization, direct and indirect hospital costs, total hospital costs, the percentage of total costs attributable to direct costs, and the percentage of total costs attributable to indirect costs.
RESULTS: No significant age differences existed among the 3 patient groups. Significant differences (Kruskal-Wallis) were observed for all variables. The PR group was compared with the PMF and MFFT groups. Total patient charges were greatest in the MFFT group (mean, $22 821.04) and least for the PR group (mean, $13 125.70). Length of stay was greatest in the PMF group (mean, 7.53 days) and shortest in the PR group (mean, 5.53 days).
CONCLUSIONS: Intricate reconstructions are frequently more times consuming than primary closure, and the additional surgical procedures are more likely to use more hospital resources. Efforts at providing superior functional outcomes must be balanced against increasing restrictions on the use of health care dollars. Careful evaluation of functional outcomes and quality of life will be required to justify the increased expenditure incurred when providing complex reconstructions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12479723     DOI: 10.1001/archotol.128.12.1377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0886-4470


  8 in total

Review 1.  Economic burden of head and neck cancer. A literature review.

Authors:  Jennifer M Lee; Marco Turini; Marc F Botteman; Jennifer M Stephens; Chris L Pashos
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2004-02

Review 2.  Cost-of-illness studies : a review of current methods.

Authors:  Ebere Akobundu; Jing Ju; Lisa Blatt; C Daniel Mullins
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Multicenter prospective micro-costing study evaluating mandibular free-flap reconstruction.

Authors:  Olivier Dassonville; Alexandre Bozec; Yann Château; Emile Reyt; Bernard Devauchelle; Marie-Yolande Louis; Pierre Breton; Morbize Julieron; Jacques Yachouh; Yann Mallet; Jérôme Sarini; Gilles Dolivet; Renaud Schiappa; Jocelyn Gal; Marie-Helene Orlanducci; Gilles Poissonnet; Emmanuel Chamorey
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Is there still a role for bilobed/bipaddled pectoralis major myocutaneous flap for single-stage immediate reconstruction of post ablative oncologic full-thickness defects of the cheek?

Authors:  Nitin Bhola; Anendd Jadhav; Rajiv Borle; Gaurav Khemka; Sanatan Kumar; Harshit Shrivastava
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-08-17

5.  Change in reimbursement and costs in German oncological head and neck surgery over the last decade: ablative tongue cancer surgery and reconstruction with split-thickness skin graft vs. microvascular radial forearm flap.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoefert; Oliver Lotter
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Bipaddle Pectoralis Major Myocutaneous Flap for Single Stage Reconstruction of Oromandibular Defects.

Authors:  P K Sahu; Satish Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-08-19

Review 7.  Contemporary role of pectoralis major regional flaps in head and neck surgery.

Authors:  F Bussu; R Gallus; V Navach; R Bruschini; M Tagliabue; G Almadori; G Paludetti; L Calabrese
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.124

8.  Staged reconstruction brachytherapy has lower overall cost in recurrent soft-tissue sarcoma.

Authors:  Arash O Naghavi; Ricardo J Gonzalez; Jacob G Scott; Youngchul Kim; Yazan A Abuodeh; Tobin J Strom; Michelle Echevarria; John E Mullinax; Kamran A Ahmed; Louis B Harrison; Daniel C Fernandez
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2017-01-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.